This is Dorset | CommuniGate | Christchurch Local History Society Feedback
This is Dorset -  CommuniGate
*
Content * * *
Home Page

Membership

Committee Members

The Millenium Trail

The Local History Room

The CLHS Journal

Christchurch Castle

Historical Map Resources

Benjamin Ferrey - A Biographical Note

Events Programme 2007/08

VE Day Anniversary

Books and Publications

A.W.N. Pugin and Christchurch I

A.W.N. Pugin and Christchurch II

Articles from the Journal I

Articles from the Journal II

Articles from the Journal III

Membership Form

Historical Overview

Natasha Kaplinsky

The Goldwyers of Somerford

Message Board and Guestbook - How To Use Them

Links for Christchurch Local History Society

Message Board

Guestbook

Mail Form

*

A.W.N. Pugin and Christchurch - Part 2

LINKS WITH HIGHCLIFFE

In Part 1, the famous architect and designer Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin’s (1812-1852) connections with Christchurch were explored. Part 2 looks at Pugin’s links with Highcliffe. In the years following 1832 it seems probable that Pugin occasionally found time to re-visit the Christchurch area, despite his hectic and ever-growing work schedule. Ferrey's 1861 biography [Ref 1] describes a rather brief and somewhat ill-mannered visit to Highcliffe in 1835.

In order to set the scene for this account, it is necessary to briefly return to the late 1820s. It was at this time that A.W.N. Pugin's father took his son and a number of his pupils, including Benjamin Ferrey, on expeditions to France to draw and sketch medieval buildings. Both young men, still in their teens, saw at first hand the removal of carved stonework and other items for shipment to England. Fragments of these ancient monuments were then undervalued in France and there was a lively trade in shipping items across the Channel to wealthy collectors and connoisseurs in England. The elder Pugin regarded such trade as abhorrent and this stance, no doubt, was impressed upon his young protégés.

A.W.N. Pugin's career began to take off in the late 1820s. The younger Pugin had much to deal with, not least of which was his own precocious talent. In 1832 and 1833 he lost both his first wife and his parents. He found himself propelled into his late father's business affairs and seems to have become a 'workaholic'. He pursued two businesses in parallel, furniture design and stage scenery design. He re-married as soon as 1833 and by 1834 he had given up his unreliable furniture and theatre jobs and had devoted himself to the study of Gothic architecture.

By contrast, Ferrey's career was slower to get off the ground. He toured on the continent in the early 1830s and began an architectural practice in London in 1834 in partnership with Thomas Larkins Walker. His first major commission was to create designs for the Gervis estate in Bournemouth (the Westover Villas and the Bath Hotel in 1836-1840) and he was married in 1836.

In parallel with Pugin's tumultuous early life and Ferrey's steady development, a local building project was underway at Highcliffe, some 3 miles from Christchurch. Highcliffe Castle was built between 1831 and 1835 by Lord Stuart de Rothesay (1779-1845). Lord Stuart employed architect William John Donthorne, a founder member of RIBA, to design his new home. The design incorporated carved medieval stonework that Lord Stuart had acquired from the Norman Benedictine Abbey at Jumiéges and from the Grande Maison des Andelys, both of which had become derelict following the French Revolution. These were to include an entire oriel window, the 'King's Oriel', and also a complete window of stained glass, both from the sixteenth century. Examples of stained glass from France and other European countries, dating as far back as the twelfth century, were also introduced.

High Cliffe - the home of Lord Stuart de Rothesay

Both Pugin and Ferrey would undoubtedly have taken a keen interest in Lord Stuart's building works. Ferrey would have known this area from his youth and it seems probable that Pugin took an interest in the building as he knew that the exterior would incorporate Gothic elements. So it was that in December 1835 Pugin paid a visit to Highcliffe, as vividly recounted by Ferrey in his 1861 biography:-

"Curious stories are told of Pugin in reference to his independent spirit while corresponding with employers or directing their works. The following is a specimen of this. The late Lord Stuart de Rothesay, having found some beautiful remains of a conventual building in the south of France, and being about to build a residence on the south-east coast near Christchurch, determined to purchase the materials, have them removed to England, and use them as far as they could be made applicable to the design of a new and large mansion.

The site chosen by his Lordship was a part of the high cliff facing the Isle of Wight. Near this spot there had formerly been a house belonging to the Earl of Bute, the celebrated minister, which, owing to the encroachment of the sea on that part of the coast, was literally by degrees washed into it. Still Lord Stuart thought that by draining the land springs and taking other precautions he could prevent the spread of further mischief. Acting on this belief, he began the erection of a stately pile at such a distance from the edge of the cliff as was thought sufficient to leave a good margin to the buildings for ages to come [evidently and thankfully some of this margin remains to this day!]. But notwithstanding all precautions the drainage has not been so effectual as to save the cliff from disruption. By the expansion of frozen land springs after severe frosts, and the encroachment of the sea, landslips still occasionally take place.

Lord Stuart not being perfectly satisfied with the design of the building, which was being conducted under the superintendence of the late Mr. Donthorn, and desiring to obtain the mature judgement of Pugin, invited him to High Cliff to act as his consulting architect. He at once assented, and repaired to High Cliff to inspect the works.

Arriving in the afternoon, he engaged himself busily in examining all that was going on; soon made himself master of his subject, and with his usual rapidity, before the close of the day had prepared sketches for Lord Stuart's approval.

After dinner he exhibited his plans, entering into explanations, and pointing out all the alterations which he considered indispensable. His suggestions, unfortunately, did not fall on such willing ears as he expected. Lord S. had spent large sums in the work already done, and was not disposed to pull down heavy stonework just finished; and some amount of demolition was quite necessary to meet Pugin's views. After much discussion, therefore, they separated. Lord Stuart intended to resume the subject on the next morning, but in this he was disappointed. To meet Pugin's convenience, an early breakfast hour was appointed for the next day, and at the time fixed some surprise was expressed that he did not appear. Inquiry being made, it was discovered that Pugin had risen at six o'clock, taken his carpet bag in hand, walked some distance to a little way-side inn [perhaps the Cat & Fiddle], and thence taken his departure by coach to London, without previously giving the slightest intimation of his intention to any one in the house. Thus terminated his connexion with Lord Stuart de Rothesay. All this abruptness arose from the simple circumstance that his employer did not at once adopt his recommendations. Probably this discourtesy would not have been shown at an earlier period in his career, but he had now obtained such a professional standing that he could afford to disregard giving offence."

Thus it was that the 24 year old Pugin, at the height of his energies and talents, let down the older Lord Stuart. It is intriguing to wonder what became of those sketches and how Highcliffe Castle would have appeared if Pugin's consultancy had been taken on board. No doubt a full Gothic treatment would have ensued. Whilst Highcliffe is undoubtedly an impressive building and has been feted as "the most important remaining example of the Romantic and Picturesque style of architecture", it can be argued that it lacks a certain purity and could even be viewed as something of an architectural compromise. No doubt it was the very whiff of a compromise that sent Pugin fleeing.

References :-

1 Ferrey, Benjamin. Recollections of A.N. Welby Pugin, and his father Augustus Pugin; with notices of their works . With an appendix by E. Sheridan Purcell. London, Edward Stanford 1861.

Notes compiled by Fraser Donachie. Further details of the Pugin Society may be found at www.pugin-society.1to1.org.

Copyright © Fraser Donachie 2006

Email Email page
Feedback Feedback
Home Home


Home Page |Membership |Committee Members |The Millenium Trail |The Local History Room |The CLHS Journal |Christchurch Castle |Historical Map Resources |Benjamin Ferrey - A Biographical Note |Events Programme 2007/08 |VE Day Anniversary |Books and Publications |A.W.N. Pugin and Christchurch I |A.W.N. Pugin and Christchurch II |Articles from the Journal I |Articles from the Journal II |Articles from the Journal III |Membership Form |Historical Overview |Natasha Kaplinsky |The Goldwyers of Somerford |Message Board and Guestbook - How To Use Them |Links for Christchurch Local History Society |Message Board |Guestbook |Mail Form