This is Herefordshire | CommuniGate | All About Childcare Feedback
This is Herefordshire -  CommuniGate
*
Content * * *
Undiscovered Country

Children and Television

Child Development

Community an Violence

Drugs

Practicle exercises

Food

Money

Medical

Fun Activities with your child

Emotional subjects

How To Resolve Arguments The Easy Way

Comic books

An adoption baby shower

Mom my hair is falling out

Is your teenager is at risk

Message Board

Guestbook

Mail Form

*

Brain Development

How the Adolescent Brain Challenges the Adult Brain
by Dr. Kathie F. Nunley
What makes the adolescent brain so challenging to the adult brain? Anyone who has ever tried to parent, teach or mentor the adolescent brain knows it can create some frustrating moments. A lot of this frustration can be blamed on some of the biology unique to the
adolescent brain.
In any aged brain, the region responsible for basic survival needs (eat, flight/fight, sex) are handled by a region known as the hypothalamus. For obvious reason, the hypothalamus
is powerful, influential and ready to function right from birth. Biologically speaking, if this area was not given top priority, the animal may not survive for long.
One of the frustrations with adolescents is due to the fact that hormones, environment, and learning, make this survival region of the brain a "hot area" in adolescent brains.
In addition, the basic survival drives of the hypothalamus don't always agree with the social structure, morals and safety of society. For the more "civilized" human behaviors we need to involve higher regions of the brain. Higher brain regions, in the cortex, can over-ride the hypothalamus. Although these regions are not given biological priority, they are the "logical" parts of the brain and are responsible for deciding when basic hypothalamus drives may
not be in our best long-term interest.
A region called the pre-frontal cortex plays the role of arbitrator in making these critical decisions. It quickly sizes up the situation and makes a determination which then drives our behavior. It is the pre-frontal cortex then that tells us when to act on our anger, or curtail it, eat that second piece of dessert, or go without, seek immediate gratification or hold off for the long term.
Unfortunately some people have a poorly developed or poorly functioning pre-frontal cortex. These people have a hard time controlling impulsive behaviors. Head trauma, alcohol and drug abuse as well as possible genetic predispositions can all lead to a dysfunctional pre-frontal cortex. Maturity also plays a big role as this area takes about 20 years to fully develop. Hence, adolescents may have problems quickly sizing up risks and making good
long-term decisions.
Other biological factors make adolescent brains even more hypothalamus driven. Children learn what to do with anger by watching other people in their sphere of influence and what they do when they are angy. Peer-influence peaks during the teen-age years which means that key role models for an adolescent are other adolescents.
The hormone, oxytocin, found in the brain during romantic relationships, tends to settle and stimulate the hypothalamus during the beginning stages of the relationship. Anyone working
with adolescents knows that they are always in the midst of "new love", which only further hampers logical decision making.
So adolescents appear to have at least 3 strikes against them when it comes to using logic to weigh the risks in dangerous or sometimes even everyday types of decisions. The more primitive regions of their brains are strong and tend to drive behaviors. The immature region
responsible for the logic of long-term benefits does not always override the impulsive, survival-oriented hypothalamus. Add any additional trauma to the mix such as abusive households or drug and alchol use and the issue becomes even more severe.
The biology of brain shows that adolescents still need strong adult guidance and help with decision making throughout the teen-age years . Time and good role models will fortunately allow the brain to eventually mature to match the body.
Kathie F Nunley is an eduational psychologist, author and speaker in Salt Lake City, Utah. Founder of brains.org and the Layered Curriculum (tm) method of instruction, Kathie can be reached at: kathie@brains.org
Full references and additional teaching and parental tips
are available at: http://Help4Teachers.com

Brain Biology

Brain Biology: basic gardening.



By Kathie F Nunley
As you read the words on this page, you are utilizing thousands of the 100 billion (more or less) nerve cells that make up your brain. The electrical firings and chemical messages running between these cells, called neurons, are what produce our thoughts, feelings and interactions with the world around us.
One hundred billion neurons may seem like a lot of nerve cells, but is actually only about 20% of the number we originally start with. The number of nerve cells in our brain peaks prenatally and then they start to prune themselves out, one by one, through childhood. By the time we enter adolescence, our brain has chosen the final select neurons it will keep throughout our adult life. The decision is based on which cells we use and which we do not. The cells we do not use are pruned away leaving more room to add branches, or dendrites, to the nerve cells that we do use. New branches are added as the brain receives and processes any new information.
How does the brain actually "prune" the garden? The answer lies in a number of chemicals and their actions and reactions. The chief pruner is probably an enzyme named Calpain. Calpain has the abililty to self-destruct a cell. Technically this is known as autolysis ("auto" meaning self, and "lysis" meaning to destroy).
Calpain is produced in the nerve cells when there is a heavy calcium ion concentration in their surrounding environment. Reduced blood flow can cause this high calcium ion build up between and within cells (for you biology enthusiasts, the calcium comes from the mitochondria and the ER as well as an influx from outside the cell). In other words, high activitiy in a brain region calls for heavy blood flow to service the cells, low activity requires little blood flow. Therefore, the less-used areas, with their limited blood flow activity, tend to build up calcium ions. This build-up triggers the secretion of the enzyme Calpain, which causes the nerve cell to self -destruct.
New growth, on the other hand, comes in the dendrite development, or branching of well-used neurons. This branching is caused from chemicals known as Neurotrophins. Neurotrophins are a group of proteins which are responsible for the growth and development of neurons. As you may suspect, we use a lot of neurotrophins during childhood as the brain has massive growth and development. But we continue to use neurotrophins all of our lives, especially in the hippocampus area, the brain region responsible for new learning and new memory formation.
There are many neurotrophins at work in the brain. The first one discovered is known as NGF (nerve growth factor). Others, discovered since, have equally self-explanatory names as brain derived neurotrophic factor (bFGF), and glial cell-line derived neurotropic factor (GDNF). These neurotrophins work by attaching themselves to receptor sites on nerve cells and causing the cell membrane to change shape, grow and branch.
Because most growth hormones throughout the body are especially active during sleep, it is thought that the majority of neurotrophic work is also done during sleep, especially the non-REM cycles of sleep. The work of Marcos Frank and Michael Stryker, at UC San Francisco, caught the education world by surprise in 2001 with their startling research showing the tremendous amount of branching and subsequent learning that took place during sleep. While most of the science community historically considered that the REM, or dreaming cycle of sleep was the time when most wiring took place, Stryker's work and the research following that study continue to show that it is actually the non-REM cycles that help hard wire in the information learned the previous day.
From a practical standpoint, sleep research continues to show the importance of sleep to the learning brain. Students MUST get sufficient sleep following the learning of new information if we want that information stored in a long-term, complex network of neuron branches.
The research on brain wiring and the biology behind it continues to be a fascinating topic. It gives hope to people with stroke damage, Alzheimer's and other neurological problems, as well as providing a better understanding for those of us who parent and teach young brains.
Remember to learn something new today. . . then sleep on it.
Kathie F Nunley is an educational psychologist in Salt Lake City, Utah. Founder of Brains.org and the developer of the Layered Curriculum (tm) method of instruction, Kathie can be reached via email at Kathie@brains.org.
References:
Bax, et al. (1997). Structure, 5, 1275-1285.
Birkbeck, et al. 1991. Nature 354: 411-414.
Bothwell, M. & Rev, A. (1995). Neuroscience. 18, 223-253.
Cunningham, L. et al. (1994). Brain Research, 658, 219-231.
Date, I. et al. (1996). Neurosurgery, 84, 1006-1012.
DiStefano, P. et al (1992). Neuron, 8, 983-993.
Frank, M. & Stryker, M. 2001, April 26. Neuron.
Gage, F. et al. (1988). Neurology. 269, 147-155.
Kang, H., et al. (1997). Neurotrophins and time: different roles for TrkB signaling in hippocampal long-term potentiation,, Neuron, 19, 653-664.
Kang, H. & Schuman, E.M. (1996). A requirement for local protein synthesis in neurotrophin-induced synaptic plasticity, Science, 273, 1402-1406.
Lindholm D, et al. (1997). Neurotrophins and cerebellar development. Perspectives on Developmental Neurobiology. 5(1):83-94.
Lindsay, R. et al. (1994). Neuroscience. 17, 182-190.
Paschen W. & Doutheil J. (1999). Disturbances of the functioning of endoplasmic reticulum: A key mechanism underlying neuronal cell injury? Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 19(1):1-18.
Schweizer F. et al., (1998). Regulation of neurotransmitter release kinetics by NSF. Science. 279(5354):1203-1206.
Thoenen, H. (1995). Neurotrophins and neuronal plasticity. Science 270: 593-598.
More tips and ideas at: http://brains.org
Kathie F. Nunley is an educational psychologist, author, researcher and speaker from Salt Lake City, Utah. Developer of the Layered Curriculum(tm) method of instruction, Dr. Nunley has authored several books and articles on teaching in mixed-ability classrooms and other problems facing today's teachers. Full references and additional teaching and parental tips are available at: http://Help4Teachers.com Kathie@brains.org















Are we bringing up Clones?

Mutants or Clones?
by: Jeffrey D. Murrah, LPC

In a single dose of children's television, I was bombarded with themes of mutants, cyborgs, evolving and the digital world. These words intimidated me at first, until I learned what the shows were talking about. I wondered how this prepares children for living in the 21st century. The answer hit me when I came across the saying, "Don't Clone...Mutate."
For those not familiar with the new language, a few definitions are in order. A clone is an exact replica of the original source. Clones are trained to mindlessly conform. Success and failure are based on how well the clone conforms rather than on the clone's accomplishments and abilities. A mutant is someone or something that has changed from the original source. Mutants are evaluated on their abilities and accomplishments.
In raising children, some parents behave as if training clones. There are some ways to tell if one is raising clones.

Children are expected to engage in sports and activities just because their parents did.
Children are expected to have the same taste in music as their parents.
Phrases like "it's my way or the highway" are frequently heard.
Teens are steered toward specific vocations because that is what their parents did.
Personal needs and preferences of family members are set aside to 'keep the peace.'
Children report feeling 'invisible 'or 'like a robot.'
Children are viewed as smaller versions of the parents.
Problems within the family are never solved, but rather avoided. In some cases, there are no new problems, but the same one occurring over and over again.
Children's efforts at independence are met with predictions of catastrophe.
The way to stop 'cloning' is to train children to mutate. 'To mutate' means to be able to adjust to change, to be flexible or resilient, to become an individual. Some of the steps parents can take to 'individuate' or 'mutate' are:

Encourage children to try 'new' things. This could be new sports, food, books or adventures.
Encourage your child in developing a hobby of their choice. Show an interest in developing the hobby. Don't just pay it lip service, find out about the hobby. From my sons, I have developed my knowledge of baseball, sharks, trains, and wildlife that I would not otherwise have.
Allow your child to make choices appropriate for their age.
Practice working through problems rather than imposing solutions.
Use the question "What other solutions could there be to this problem?"
Confront setbacks with "Failure is something you do, not who you are."
Raising children to change and adapt to change is threatening to some parents, because it emphasizes responsibility rather than control. Adapting to changes means taking the risk of 'letting go' of some of the control. I often use the metaphor that it is easier to steer a car in motion, than one sitting still. Likewise, it is easier to direct your children when they are trying new things, than when they are behaving like a robot.





About The Author

Jeffrey D. Murrah, LPC, LMFT, LCDC is The Results-Oriented Therapist specializing in marriage and family conflicts. Visit www.RestoreTheFamily.com to sign up for his free newsletter.
jeff@RestoreTheFamily.com

Manners

Teaching Children Good Manners
by: Rexanne Mancini


Last week in my newsletter, I mentioned that my children knew how to behave in nice restaurants because they had been exposed to the atmosphere at an early age. My idea of well behaved might be different from yours, however, I think there are certain basics that are important and universal.
When my daughters were babies, we would take them wherever we went. If they began to fuss or cry, one of us would promptly remove them from the room/restaurant/market/wherever. Not because we felt their crying or fussing was a bad thing. No, it's a perfectly normal occurrence for infants and toddlers. We removed them as a courtesy to others who we felt did not need to be as tolerant as we were with our children's noise. In consequence, my daughters know that other people are not as wildly in love with their racket or with them as we are. Nor should they be expected to be.
As our children grew older, they were always told the rules of our outings, how to behave and to always speak softly if other adults were present. Sometimes, it's fine to let them get a little crazy ... just know your audience! If we are at a five star restaurant where many other diners have come to enjoy a gracious and expensive meal, would we expect everyone there to be enthralled with junior's vocal or behavioral outbursts? Would we really expect them to care if our child is having a bout with walking pneumonia and coughing uncontrollably? Nope. It's rude. And rudeness is basically nothing more than bad manners. If there is an emergency with your child, by all means don't give a flying flamingo about what others think. But this is the exception. Besides, children who are that sick belong at home, not in public.
Last night, my girls and I were in a department store. There was a toddler carrying on and screaming for more than 15 minutes when my younger daughter said: "Now his mommy is going to tell him to stop because there are other people in here that don't want to hear it!"
Unfortunately, his mommy did not tell him any such thing. She let him wail and scream and cry, much to the chagrin and annoyance of everyone else in the store. You know what? As much as I love kids and cannot bear to see or hear them suffering, I disliked this kid immensely!
My reasoning is this: if our kids learn that they are free to trample on the peace, space or rose gardens of others, they will develop into spoiled and inconsiderate brats. And then who will like them? Who will want to spend time with them? Who, besides their forgiving parents, will be able to tolerate their lack of social graces and good manners? No one … except maybe another ill-mannered person who feels at home with a similarly clueless individual. Do we really want our children reduced to such horrible options? I think not.
We teach our children not to steal, lie or punch their brother in the nose. Shouldn't we teach them respect for others at the same time? That their whining and out-of-control behavior is something no one really wants to hear or witness, especially strangers who have no vested interest in their developing minds or self-esteem? A simple reminder of the rules, consistently, works wonders ... eventually. ;-)
Good luck. Kids need to learn manners and social graces. They will go farther in life if we teach them well.
Copyright – 2000-2004- Rexanne Mancini





About The Author

Rexanne Mancini is the mother of two daughters, Justice and Liberty. She is a novelist, freelance writer and maintains an extensive yet informal parenting and family web site, Rexanne.com – http://www.rexanne.com -Visit her site for good advice, award-winning Internet holiday pages and some humor to help you cope. Subscribe to her free newsletter, Rexanne’s Web Review, for a monthly dose of Rexanne: http://www.rexanne.com/rwr-archives.html
rexanne@rexanne.com

Email Email page
Feedback Feedback
Home Home


Undiscovered Country |Children and Television |Child Development |Community an Violence |Drugs |Practicle exercises |Food |Money |Medical |Fun Activities with your child |Emotional subjects |How To Resolve Arguments The Easy Way |Comic books |An adoption baby shower |Mom my hair is falling out |Is your teenager is at risk |Message Board |Guestbook |Mail Form