This is The North East | CommuniGate | Saint Cuthbert's Church, Shotley Bridge Feedback
This is The North East -  CommuniGate
*
Content * * *
Home Page

How to find us

Activities

Services & Times

How can we help?

Church Hall & Bookings

Who's Who?

This Sunday's Bible Readings

Parish News - May 2008

Parish Gallery 2001

Homilies: October 2001 - February 2002

This Month's Calendar

Thinking about Baptism

Thinking about Marriage

Faith & Action - inclusiveness and opportunity

Aids to Prayer

Children & Holy Communion

Homilies: Easter-tide 2002

Homilies: May - November 2002

Parish Review 2002

Photo Page 2002

Homilies: December 2002 - February 2003

Celebrating 2003 - people in pictures

Homilies: Lent & Easter-tide 2003

Ordinary Time - Sermons 2003

Pictures - summer 2003

Sermons - Advent 2003 - Epiphany 2004

Annual Reports 2007 (APCM 2008)

Sermons - Lent & Easter-tide 2004

Sermons - Ordinary Time 2004

Sunday School

Sermons - Advent + Christmas 2004, Epiphany 2005

Sermons - Lent & Easter 2005

Sermons - Ordinary Time 2005

St. Paul - a series from St. Cuthbert's

Sermons: Advent 2005 to Trinity Sunday 2006

Sermons - Ordinary Time 2006

Sermons 2007

Sermons 2008

Contact Information for Parish of Saint Cuthbert, Benfieldside

Links for Parish of Saint Cuthbert, Benfieldside

Guestbook

Mail Form

*

Sermons 2007

A selection of sermons preached at St. Cuthbert's.

Sermons are only included here (a) if the preacher lets us have a script, and (b) if there is a script!

That's to say there are quite a few occasions when the sermon is delivered in a way we can't reproduce here. So to get the full flavour, join us in person!

A Sermon for Candlemas

28 January 2007

Paul Heatherington,
Reader at St. Cuthbert's

Luke 2:22-40



I was recently surfing the Internet and I found a poem about the Fenwick’s Christmas window display. This mentioned nymphs, goblins, fairies, enchanted castles, nodding lions, wizards, kings and jesters and nursery rhyme characters. Although this window display has delighted people for years, mostly it has nothing much to do with Christmas for Christians. Fenwick’s remove the display to accommodate the sales on Boxing Day. For many, as soon as Christmas Day is over, Christmas is in the past. Have you noticed that immediately after Christmas Day, people often say ‘Did you have a nice Christmas?’ Christmas for Christians does not end on 25th December. The season continues and in fact, it is only today that the season of Christmas formally ends.

Do you remember Waiting for God, the comedy series starring Stephanie Cole and Graham Crowden? Diana Trent and Tom Ballard were two elderly delinquents lived out their lives stubbornly fighting the world in which they found themselves – a world where mature infirm people were scorned. Diana Trent was the fearsome, prickly, bloody-minded, cantankerous woman. Diana ranted at those who refused to see beyond her ageing body. She was a real person in her own right, and she was frustrated at how she was mistreated by those who wrongly imagined her hostility and cutting remarks were the long-winded odd behaviour of a dejected old lady unable to look after herself. Her maxim was ‘If you’re angry, you know you’re still alive’. Tom Ballard, another star of the series, was a kinder, milder, and more cheerful person, though somewhat delusional in a world of his own.

Simeon and Anna, the two ageing characters featured in the Gospel reading we heard could hardly be more different to Diana Trent and Tom Ballard. Simeon wasn’t confused or delusional. Simeon was an old man, waiting for God… patiently waiting for God to fulfil a promise made to him that he would not die until he saw the Messiah.

According to the Jewish law, Mary was to come to the synagogue on the fortieth day:

‘And when the time came for the purification according to the law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law, a pair of turtle doves or two young pigeons.’

The law told Mary to offer a sacrifice of a lamb or if she could not afford a lamb, she was to offer two turtle doves or two pigeons. Mary sacrificed two turtle doves or two pigeons which tells us two things: first that Mary and Joseph were observant Jews. And secondly that Jesus was brought up in a poor family.

Have you ever studied the central image of Jesus in the liturgical east window? This is a picture of Jesus holding one lamb – which looks lovingly up to him – with other lambs gathered around. In the Hebrew Scriptures, the Shepherds or leaders in Israel were criticised for putting themselves first.

In contrast, Jesus said that He was the Good Shepherd, the promised leader who
• knows his sheep.
• keeps them safe from violent attack.
• gives everlasting life to those who follow Him

Jesus, the Good Shepherd spoke of ‘laying down his life for the sheep’. I mention that stained glass window for a reason. If you look very carefully at the picture of Jesus as the Good Shepherd you will see there is also a tree and two turtle doves. The two turtle doves clearly refer to Mary’s sacrifice when she came to the Temple in Jerusalem for purification and they prefigure – that is foreshadow or anticipate – Christ’s sacrifice for us. In the Christmas season, we think of the joy of the coming of Jesus, and look back to his birth. The message of Christmas is that God came to us in flesh and bones and emotions. Today, we celebrate the end of Christmas and just as the stained glass artist reminds us that Jesus our Good Shepherd was to offer himself as a sacrifice for us on a tree, we are now inescapably drawn to thinking about Christ’s death and sacrifice for us, as we turn our attention to Christ’s passion.

Simeon saw the baby Jesus and said,

‘Lord, now let your servant depart in peace according to your word, for my eyes have seen your salvation which has been prepared for all people.’

Simeon saw the baby Jesus and recognised Him as the Messiah and believed. Anna was an 84 year old widow and she was poor. She too saw the baby Jesus and believed. Simeon calls Jesus ‘a light to enlighten the Gentiles’. From this, this special day in the Church’s calendar was made into a feast of candles. The candlelight reminds us of that greater light which spreads out from the figure of Jesus. My grandfather used to tell me that you had not experienced darkness, until you experienced the pitch black darkness of a coalmine without a light. We now rarely experience darkness. Can you imagine a world before electric lights, when after dark, candles were the only light. Then there was darkness.

Compare that with light. There is joy in candlelight dinners and candles on Christmas Eve, our busiest church service of the year.

Today, we light candles to recognise that a special light has come to us from outside our darkness, the child of Bethlehem, the light of the world. We light the candles because the light shines in the darkness and the darkness two thousand years later has not overcome it. We go out from here today taking with us a light, a symbol, not of our own light. The light we take with us is of the light that shone in the darkness at the beginning of creation and darkness could not overcome it. This light was a light to enlighten the gentiles, the nations, all the nations and races and culture of people of the world.

Do you look at Wayside pulpits? You know the sort of thing. ‘I was going to waste, but Jesus recycled me.’ ‘Wise men come to Jesus. Foolish men stay at home.’ This recent wayside pulpit display was at St Andrews, Blackhill: ‘Jesus: Born in Bethlehem. Raised in Nazareth. Raised in Jerusalem.’ As I pondered on this message, I wondered if a snappier message might have been ‘Jesus: Born in Bethlehem. Brought up in Nazareth. Raised in Jerusalem.’ But the real point of the message is to emphasise that we are not a Christmas people, we are an Easter people and Hallelujah is our chorus.

Sacrifices were once offered in the Temple in Jerusalem day after day: lambs, turtle doves or pigeons. All those years ago in the Temple, Mary offered a sacrifice of two turtle doves. The High Priest in the Temple used to offer sacrifices for his own sins and for those of the people. Jesus, our High Priest, did this for us once for all. Jesus’ death and resurrection, His once for all offering on Calvary, once for all times, once for all peoples, is the single most important event in human history. Perhaps we can reflect on what this means to us as we take the light of Christ with us today. We now leave Christmas and look forward to the coming days travelling together, first on the journey Jesus himself made to His death and then on to Easter Day, when we shall again light a candle to celebrate the light of Christ, as Jesus is raised in Jerusalem.


The vision of God and the touch of Christ

3 before Lent (Proper 1) Year C
4.ii.2007 - Eucharist

Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Isaiah 6.1-8;
1 Corinthians 15.1-11; Luke 5.1-11.



Each of the readings we’ve heard this morning is set in very different circumstances. Isaiah transported into a heavenly vision of God in all his majesty and glory. St. Paul writing a letter of encouragement to the Christians of Corinth. Jesus calling the first disciples from the work they are doing as fishermen on the Sea of Galilee, Lake Genessaret. But I’m struck by something they have in common – most especially in a sense of inadequacy expressed by Isaiah and Peter. Isaiah, unable to comprehend the great vision of seraphs and angels, cries out, “Woe is me! I am lost, for I am a man of unclean lips and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips.” Peter’s words, as he falls down before Jesus, are not much different: “Go away from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man.” It’s a common sense of unworthiness. St. Paul, reflecting on his experience of Christ would be able to tell them what he says to the Corinthians: “Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures.” But even Paul must first recognize himself as “the least of the apostles, unfit to be called an apostle…” It’s only “the grace of God” which can bring him to be what he is: “by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace towards me has not been in vain.”

Paul is the New Testament writer who seems more than most to have things worked out. Perhaps we need to go back behind Paul’s eventual conclusions to go deeper into the experience of Isaiah and Peter in their inability to make sense of what is going on. Isaiah’s vision of God in the Temple seems to be the experience which starts him off on his task of being a prophet to his people – it’s a ministry which will last through the reign of four kings, and it starts here in the year that the first of those kings, Uzziah, died. It’s an amazing vision of God’s glory, a Temple filled with the smoke of incense, the beating of seraphic wings, and angelic hosts singing a great acclamation of praise to God. It’s so amazing that Isaiah can only stand there and lament his inadequacy: “Woe is me! I am lost, for I am a man of unclean lips and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips.” How can anything that Isaiah might say compare with what he has seen… when he knows only his own smallness, his knowledge of his sin, his sense that he can have nothing worth saying? You might have that feeling yourself… “A man of unclean lips” is going to be someone who will find that whatever he says, he’ll get it wrong. Try our best and the words we use come out wrong. And it doesn’t help to “dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips” – that’s to know that whatever our good intentions, people will choose to take things the wrong way, will take our best intentions and turn them against us, and bad-mouth us to anyone who will listen. In a sense that’s to be human, to live in the midst of human dilemmas, where we’re in a hole, can’t stop digging, and find people simply throwing more dirt back at us in the bottom of the hole.

It’s when we feel like this that it becomes so important to look at the bigger picture. We can feel so small because God is so big, but it is his very hugeness that reaches out to us. In the din of the worship of angels he can hear Isaiah’s pathetic plea – he does not fail to see him standing there in his smallness but lifts him up sending one of the seraphs to him. And as the seraph touches his lips with a burning coal taken from the altar, Isaiah recognises that he is healed, his guilt is taken away, his life has purpose and that will require him to make his response to God. He realises that God is speaking to him. His response has to be “Here I am; send me.”

Do we recognise that for ourselves… that in the vastness of the ever-expanding universe made up of billions of worlds, God notices us? … God notices me? Just as God sees Isaiah through all the throngs of angels… Just as God needs not the voices raised by choirs of seraphs round his throne, but the words which will be spoken by a man of unclean lips. God needs us… God needs me… That’s the message which is made so clear in today’s Gospel. It’s the way St. Luke describes the calling of the first disciples. Who does Jesus want as his followers? Not people of great wisdom and intelligence, not learned rabbis or temple-serving priests, but a boat-load of fishermen who have spent the night proving that they cannot even catch fish. It’s Simon Peter and his crew whom Jesus confounds. Why is this man doing this to me?... It’s there in Peter’s words: “Go away from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man.” But this is the man Jesus wants and will even call his “rock.” Jesus knows what he is doing in picking Peter. He knows the frailties of a man who is full of love, life and loyalty, but also at the same time a failure in his capacity to understand, communicate or even to keep his word. For all that, Jesus can use him. For all our uselessness, God can use us.

It’s striking that this incident which Luke puts at the start of Jesus’ ministry appears with not many differences right at the end of St. John’s Gospel after the Resurrection. The same characters are fishing, the same Christ tells them where to fish, the same Peter is put on the spot. And this says to me that what Jesus was, he always will be – for the disciples, and for us. The way Christ is finally recognised as risen shows what truly he always has been – God’s Son, living out God’s will, and doing it for us. This is Jesus who touches us where we are, just as he touched Peter, and calls us to what we shall be.

In the end, we are left like Isaiah and Peter, with the question, what will be our response? Can we accept God’s knowledge of us, and tie it in with our knowledge of ourselves? Can we make sense of our calling? – can we let God help us make sense of it?

We had a choice of two Collects this morning (the prayer we use just before our readings from Scripture). Let me read from the more traditional one – which we haven’t used or printed on the pewsheet:

Almighty God, who alone can bring order
to the unruly wills and passions of sinful humanity:
give your people grace so to love what you command
and to desire what you promise;
that, among the many changes of the world,
our hearts may surely there be fixed
where true joys are to be found;


I didn’t use it because it’s long and there’s simply so much to take in in these words. They describe the way we might feel so much of the time: sinful, inadequate, at the mercy of so many pressures and feelings pressing upon us, pulled this way and that, not knowing which way to turn next. But then, the prayer reminds us, it’s God who can make sense of it all. We only have to want and accept it: “to love what you command and to desire what you promise.”

Over the time that I’ve been on sabbatical leave, one of the central questions I’ve had to face is “what do I really desire?” What do I really want? That means to confront my own inadequacies and weaknesses. But it also involves honesty in seeking direction in my life. Not wanting something because it’s easier just to put up with it, or because people say I should do it. But asking what I really want, that might move me closer to God… Recognising that God can really use me best if I am honest about my response to him. Love and desire. These seem to be key words. If Isaiah and Peter hadn’t let them get to work in them, their lives would have been the poorer. And it’s the same for us.

That’s there to be found in one of our Collects. The other is printed on today’s pewsheet – and I hope you’ll use it in your prayers throughout the week. It’s affirming that God comes to us in Jesus and finds us where we are. In a crowd he knows us, in the workplace or at home… And it’s his touch which brings healing to us as the people we are. The prayer is that we should show Christ’s love, by our gathering together and in the transformation of our lives. We need this sense of Christ’s touch, finding me out as the person I am. And then we can know ourselves to be truly transformed.

Do we expect much of a difference? I find myself going back again and again to an incident from the lives of the Desert Fathers in the first Christian centuries:

Abba Lot went to see Abba Joseph and said to him, ‘Abba as far as I can I say my little office, I fast a little, I pray and meditate, I live in peace and as far as I can, I purify my thoughts. What else can I do?’ Then the old man stood up and stretched his hands towards heaven. His fingers became like ten lamps of fire and he said to him, ‘If you will, you can become all flame.’

Can we know that sense of burning for love of God? Can we respond when God touches us in our daily lives? Can our relationships be transformed – with other people and with God? Can our lives be changed - so that even as God uses Isaiah and Peter he can use us?




The Transfiguring Vision

Sunday next before Lent Year C

Eucharist – 18.ii.2007

Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Exodus 34.29-35;
2 Corinthians 3.12-4.2;
Luke 9.28-36



Jesus leads his disciples up a mountain to pray – and there he is transfigured before them: “the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became dazzling white,” St. Luke’s Gospel tells us. Moses and Elijah appear on either side of him. And then the disciples see his glory revealed. As time seems to stand still, the glory of Christ is revealed for what it truly is. People who live day to day lives in time are now taken out of time. The man Jesus of Nazareth, teacher and rabbi, doesn’t cease to be a man, but something of eternity comes into the picture – what Jesus in St. John’s Gospel calls the glory shared by the Son with the Father. We don’t know how long the vision lasts – because time seems to be suspended for its duration. But however long or brief, its effect will be lasting. The way God’s purpose is achieved through the earthly life of Jesus is seen to be one with the action of the Eternal Word at the heart of God from before time began. The vision we now call the Transfiguration gives us a glimpse of the divine glory and a glimmer of understanding of the divine will.

There are transfigurations which are not so divine. You can catch some of them in the reality shows which are so much part of Channel 4’s television scheduling. You are what you eat, Gillian McKeith tells us, and so she transforms people from being the quivering over-weight re-formed product of hamburgers, fizzy drinks and take-aways into a scaled-down lesser version of themselves, fuelled only by celery sticks, papaya fruits and macrobiotic food. Her subjects (or should I say, victims) really do lose weight – but then I suspect any of them would lose weight if they simply ate less of anything and took a walk round the sofa several times a day. The sad thing is to hear items such as chocolate described as “evil.” You may want to give it up for Lent – and that’s fine – but if you use such extreme terms as “evil” to describe it, then you’ve lost your grip on reality. Without a sense of scale and proportion, how can you describe what is really evil? It’s no wonder that we have a society in which 15 year olds are shooting each other for showing what they term “dis-respect.”

That’s by-the-by. Happily there’s a less moralistic offering in another programme, Ten Years Younger. Here the hapless victim is displayed looking haggard and worn out by life crises, cigarettes and sunbathing so that passers-by can guess their age. After that the challenge is to knock at least 10 years off the averaged estimate by the end of the programme – aided only by extensive plastic surgery, massive dental reconstruction, hair renovation, professional make-up and several thousand pounds worth of new clothes. The critical point in the programme is normally a week or so after the plastic surgery – when the scars are beginning to heal and the facial tissue is regenerating following the all-over skin peel. You can see – says the host – how your skin is starting to glow!... That’s transfiguration in TV terms – something to build up your confidence, make you feel good about yourself. But is glowing the same as glory? And how long before it fades?

That’s the catch. Now that you look 10 years younger, you’ve got to stay out of the sun, apply moisturiser several times a day, give up on cigarettes, brush your teeth for three minutes twice a day and at least an hour after meals, floss (not just for dentists!) and stop frowning… in fact try not to move any facial muscles (if you can once you’ve finished with the botox). Presumably this is the presenter’s recipe for herself which gives her the smooth facial featurelessness that Barbie trying to look serious would envy.

… The transformation that gets worked in these reality television programmes is something quite different from the Transfiguration of which we read in today’s Gospel. The clue is in the programme title. Ten Years Younger is about turning the clock back. It’s about “restoration”. But the Transfiguration of Christ is about revelation. It’s not a makeover, but seeing him for what he truly is, what he always has been, and yet what also is to come. “This is my Son, my Chosen;” says a voice from the cloud. “Listen to him!” In other words: This is God’s Son set before you. But not simply so that you can stay where you are looking on adoringly. But so that you can hear his message and act upon it.

The question of course is, what will the disciples make of the vision? Can we see its truth for us? Almost about the same time as I celebrated my 50th birthday last year, I had to get some new spectacles. The age thing was significant. The glasses I had been wearing just wouldn’t let me see things in the distance (which for me is about 10 inches) and through the same lens read anything closer than that. So I had to make the jump into varifocals. A different lens (or a different prescription within the lens) is necessary depending on what I’m looking at. The reality of what I see is just the same. But that’s not how my eyes see it. And even with these special varifocals I can still run into problems. Try to read from a lectern or a pulpit in church, and I now find that I’m looking through part of the lens which is designed for reading print held rather nearer to my eyes – so it goes blurred. If you see me holding my head right down it’s because I’m trying to look out of the top part of the varifocal lens because I can’t make out what’s written with the bottom part that’s designed for reading.

Making sense of the vision of God can, I think, be even more difficult. The first two readings we heard this morning struggle to make sense of Moses’ encounter with God. He comes down the mountain with the 10 Commandments and his face is shining with the glory of God. At first Moses doesn’t realise what’s happened. Then he puts a veil over his face until the next time that he goes to pray in the sanctuary. Is it so that the people don’t confuse the glory of God with the glory of Moses? Or is it so that when his face stops shining the people don’t realise that the glory has worn off? I’ll leave it for you to decide with these readings from Exodus and 2 Corinthians. But the point they both make is that things can’t just stay the same. You can’t spend all your life gazing wistfully at the vision in all its glory. You have to get on with living your life.

But the vision is still important. Last week I got to a point where I was feeling pretty fed up. I’d been fighting off a cold for a couple of weeks and the pain in my back was still nagging and sitting down in my study didn’t make it any better – not least because my study is the coldest room in the house with the least light. And all the niggles of life were getting at me: petty personal issues that everyone seems to carry around; the seemingly intractable problems of a wonderful new heating system in the church but wired into an electrical circuit that keeps tripping so that we can never be sure the church will be warm; church bills and vicarage bills and whether we change fuel suppliers and to which one. So I got up and went out for a walk.

It was one of those occasions which you can almost call an experience of transfiguration. I walked through the fields on the other side of the river, and then along the road between Panshields Farm past Low Waskerley back to the main road at Waskerley Lodge. And it struck me that this is the way to look at our parish. Actually it’s the only way to see the parish. Only if you get out of the parish across the river can you see the whole place from our boundary at East Law through Shotley Bridge to the point at which the far side of Bridgehill curves out of sight, and from the top of Blackhill almost into the bottom of the valley. From nearly everywhere within our parish the church and hall and vicarage are pretty well invisible. But from the other side of the valley you can see just where they are in relation to everything else – people’s homes, the schools, the other churches, the hospital, shops and places of work. And it was all the better because the sun shone, the sky was blue with only the faintest wisps of cloud, the air was still and along the whole length of the road only one vehicle passed by me. It felt so good, so peaceful with nobody about to spoil the feeling of tranquillity.

But that’s the point - and the problem. There was no one around. And I was outside the parish looking in. There was no one to disturb me. But we live our lives in the midst of other people. And the harsh reality is that they are there to make demands upon us, to irritate us, wind us up the wrong way and make us felt generally misunderstood. Wouldn’t life be wonderful if it wasn’t for life?

That’s what the disciples need to be reminded after their experience of the Transfiguration of Jesus. When the vision passes they have to go back down the mountain, and straight away they run into other people – lots of them in a crowd. And the story is that they are confronted by a man who asks them to heal his son – but they can’t. They’ve looked upon the glory of God revealed in Christ, but they can’t help the next person they meet. They must be frustrated and downcast, the boy’s father is angry - and probably pretty unreasonable because they’ve tried their best. And all I can say is “That’s Life!” We all know that experience. We’ve been there, trying our best to help other people – and they can’t accept our best intentions. Or like the boy’s father, we know what we should be able to expect from other people, but they just don’t deliver.

That’s the paradox of trying to live a Christian life. It’s knowing the reality of the God who calls us, receiving glimpses of his glory and feeling the warmth of his touch. But also knowing all too well our frailty. That our best efforts do fail. That we fulfil our calling finally only by God’s grace.

And so we come this week to the beginning of Lent, a time for renewed attempts at holiness. Let’s remember that prayer is not to be a rarefied thing. The life of prayer needs to be placed in the midst of life. We need to hear our call in Jesus, a call not first to glory but to take the way of the Cross. We need to be ready to acknowledge our failings, to know that life has its ups and its downs, to recognise that the kingdom of God is first of all worked out in the reality and messiness of this world. As one of the early Christian Desert Fathers admitted when asked how he and his brothers went about finding God: “We fall and get up, fall and get up.”


Finding the Desert Place

1st Sunday of Lent
Sunday 25th February 2007

Rosie Junemann,
Reader at St Cuthbert’s

Deuteronomy 26.1-11
Romans 10. 8b-13
Luke 4. 1-13



If you’re ever lucky enough to visit the wonderful island of Harris in the Outer Hebrides, I recommend taking a walk to the ruined chapel on Toe Head. You would set out from the little village of Northton in the south-west of the island. The walk takes you along the shore, over a grassy headland and across three small coves covered in white sand. And all the way there you will probably find yourself wondering “Why would anyone build a chapel out here, in such an isolated place?”

The question in your mind answers itself when you arrive at the chapel. When you turn back to look in the direction of Northton, the view is breathtaking. You’re looking at the broad sweep of the Sound of Harris with views, on a clear day, of North Uist and the mountains of Skye. There isn’t a sound apart from the wind and the waves and the cries of the seabirds. And there isn’t another person or a human habitation in sight! The person who chose to build his chapel here clearly had a eye for natural beauty – and he wasn’t looking for company!

Not much is known about the origin of this ancient chapel, which is said to date back to the 6th century. But we can guess that the original building would have been the tiny habitation, or cell, of a Celtic monk seeking a solitary life of prayer. Although some Celtic monks, like those who accompanied Columba from Ireland to Iona, lived in monastic communities, many preferred to seek out an isolated place, where they could live the life of a hermit. These holy men were intrepid travellers, who would brave the seas in small coracles made of wood and animal skins. We can be fairly certain that the first holy man to come to Toe Head in Harris would have travelled by sea from Ireland, or from the island of Lismore near Oban, or from the monastery at Applecross on the mainland of Scotland. His shelter would have been built from stone and wood. And he would have subsisted on a diet of wild herbs and berries, fish and seabirds eggs. He and his fellow-monks earned the name of ‘the wandering saints’. Each of them set out from their communities with the sole intention of finding ‘a desert in the sea’.


It was Jesus himself, of course, who set the pattern for all his followers who have sought to lead a solitary life. The story of his forty days in the wilderness is one many of us have known since childhood. But it’s worth taking a closer look. Luke tells us that Jesus was about thirty years old when he began his work. Jesus had been to the river Jordan to be baptized by his cousin John. This was clearly a momentous and life-changing experience for him. As he came out of the water and prayed, he received both the assurance of his heavenly Father’s love and the strength of his Spirit. He knew that he was called to be a leader, but now he had to decide how he could achieve his goals, and how to use the power he had been given. Like any one of us, he needed both time and space in which to work things out. As Jane Williams says, ‘Jesus went into the wilderness not to give something up, but to discover the meaning of something he had been given.’

Jesus needed to spend some time alone. It seems likely that, in search of a quiet space, he retreated into the Judean wilderness, perhaps to live in a cave, like other holy men of his day. There were no witnesses. So it’s plausible that in later days he used the story of his conversations with the devil to explain to his disciples how his faith was tested. In reality, perhaps, the voice of the devil represents a string of ideas in his own head. Being cold and uncomfortable, almost certainly hungry, his strongest desire would be to satisfy his physical wants and needs. But these, he knew, were less important than his spiritual needs and his response to God’s call. Yes, he guessed that his call was to become a leader of people. But he recognised that this could only be achieved through a life of humble service, not of status and power. He could, he supposed, attract people to him by using signs and wonders. But the power he had been given was to be used judiciously, and not at the whim of the devil.


Our ‘wandering saint’ in his ‘desert in the sea’, at Toe Head in Harris, was not on his own for long! These holy men who sought out the solitary life won the awe and respect of the local people, who responded with enthusiasm to the good news of their Christian teaching. As more and more people were drawn to the little cell on the headland it became necessary to build a chapel. The holy man would then retreat from time to time to a more isolated cell which he built on the rocky slopes of the mountain.

Jesus, too, when his time in the desert came to an end, returned to Galilee where his reputation rapidly spread and he began teaching in the synagogues. He was constantly on the move. Everywhere he went he was accompanied by his disciples and he attracted huge crowds of people. He faced the hostility and the challenges of the religious leaders. And people constantly made demands on him to teach and to heal. Small wonder, then, that he needed from time to time to retreat, to pray and to hear his Father’s voice. In the early stages of his ministry, Mark tells us, ‘In the morning, while it was still very dark, Jesus got up and went out to a deserted place, and there he prayed.’ (Mark 1.35) And after the feeding of the 5000, ‘he dismissed the crowds and went up the mountain by himself to pray. When evening came he was there alone’. (Matthew 14.23)

Our lives today are equally demanding - though in a different kind of way. We’re bombarded with news from all around the world, with emails, and texts and calls on mobile phones. We’re pressurized to buy, to compete, to succeed. Many people work long hours in stressful jobs. Our roads are congested and trains overcrowded. We’re urged to take exercise, be responsible and active citizens, and spend more time with our families. Keep fit, keep up, keep busy!

We need time and space, too, if we’re going to make sense of all that frenzied activity. Like Jesus, we need to work out what our priorities are, identify what God wants us to be and do, and wrestle with our own particular demons. Jesus said to his disciples, ‘Come away to a deserted place all by yourselves and rest a while’ (Mark 6.31). How can we hope to achieve that in the midst of our busy, modern lives?

There may be pivotal times in our lives when we need to retreat for a longer period, as Jesus did in the wilderness, to give more time to reflect and take stock.
A few, more adventurous, people may choose to seek out wild spaces and alternative lifestyles, like the wandering Celtic saints. But for most of us the quest for spiritual renewal is going to mean finding a ‘desert place’ nearer to home. It will be different for each one of us.

For Monty Don, the gardener, it has to be a green space. He says: “When life builds up an intolerable head of steam, there is nothing more soothing for body and soul than to sit quietly, surrounded by living green. No other colour eases the eye so well. Green is the balm that heals all the fizzing discontent of modern life”.

Many people feel closer to God in a church or a cathedral. This church will offer additional opportunities during Lent for prayer, quiet worship and reflection.

For others, retreat may be an inward process, a more intense focus of heart and mind. “That might mean”, says Jane Williams, “giving up, at least for a bit, some of the things that distract us, so that we can focus better on the essentials”.

Our Lent Extra magazine offers us reflections based on spiritual art. It also suggests that music might lead to meditation. “Music can help us to quieten our busy heads and hearts and lead us deeper into prayer”.

Lent is a time for soul-searching and reflection. It’s a time to listen for God’s quiet voice speaking to us over and above the clamour of selfish demands and worldly pleasures. We can’t hope to hear Him unless we make space in our lives for some solitude and silence.

Where, I wonder, will you find your ‘desert place’ this Lent?

Foxes and hens

Lent 2 Year C - 4.iii.07

Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Genesis 15.1-12, 17-18;
Philippians 3.17-4.1;
Luke 13.31-35



The Bible readings we’re given for use today are a strange mixture - to say the least. They’re not brought together by any coherent theme. Instead what I find is a rather odd collection of animals in the Old Testament reading and the Gospel… a heifer, a ram, and a goat (each of which gets cut up into two), a turtle dove and a pigeon – and then in the Gospel reading a fox and a hen. Where do you start with that lot?

Generally we reckon that foxes and poultry don’t mix. I’ve said before that sometimes I’ve found myself preferring the fox. There used to be a cockerel in a garden somewhere below the Vicarage, and sometimes it’s woken me up too early in the morning… the foxes of the neighbourhood are at least silent in their stealth. I find a thrill in watching a fox slip through the back garden, and still enjoy recalling the summer when a vixen would come each evening into the garden to play with her cubs. But while I enjoy watching all this through my window, I’ve also known the farmers who will throw open their windows to blast their shotguns at the unwanted prowler. For them the fox is a killer and a threat to their livelihood if it gets at the hens or the young lambs. For me there’s just the guinea pig (and the cat?) to worry about…

In our Gospel reading Jesus seems to be under no illusions. The Pharisees warn Jesus that Herod is seeking to kill him. Perhaps they’re just saying this to try to get Jesus to shut up – to stop his preaching, teaching and healing: “Get away from here,” they say. “Herod is out to get you.” But it’s no deterrent to Jesus. He knows all too well what Herod is like: “Go and tell that fox what he can do,” he replies. Jesus has work to do – today, tomorrow and on a third day when he will finish his work. Perhaps Luke is writing with the benefit of hindsight and to make a theological point – in the reference to a third day and to the completion of his work that day we can’t really fail to pick up an echo of Jesus’ Resurrection on the third day after his death on the Cross. This is the way God’s work will be seen to be done – and there’s no stopping Jesus from doing it. But perhaps the people who heard Jesus speak that day will only pick up on that later. When Jesus calls Herod “that fox” perhaps they think he’s merely speaking in a pejorative manner – much the way that modern politicians might speak of each other – to describe Herod’s shiftiness and cunning. But look again and you can see that Jesus recognises the real threat to his life. Foxes kill – and live by killing – however handsome they may appear.

Perhaps it’s because he recognises this that Luke carries us on to the following verses, where Jesus laments the waywardness of the people of Jerusalem: “How often I have desired to gather your children as a hen gathers her brood under her wings…” says Jesus. We find these words in St. Matthew’s Gospel too – but in a different context. It’s Luke – in today’s Gospel reading – who makes the connection between Jesus, acting like a hen, and Herod, the fox. It’s the hen who has most to lose when the fox is on the prowl. But this one is not fearful – this one wants to gather the brood of chicks beneath her wings… and this is an image of warmth and safety.

There’s a marvellous drawing out of this image in some words of St. Anselm of Canterbury which were translated into a modern canticle by the man who taught me liturgy, Michael Vasey – they’re words now used in daily prayer by those who use the books “Celebrating Common Prayer “ and “Common Worship”. With the title, “A Song of Christ’s Goodness,” it has the refrain:

Gather your little ones to you, O God,
as a hen gathers her brood to protect them.


And it looks to a divine motherhood in Christ:

Jesus, as a mother you gather your people to you,
you are gentle with us as a mother with her children.

Often you weep over our sins and our pride,
tenderly you draw us from hatred and judgment.

You comfort us in sorrow and bind up our wounds,
in sickness you nurse us and with pure milk you feed us.

Jesus, by your dying, we are born to new life;
by your anguish and labour we come forth in joy.

Gather your little ones to you, O God,
as a hen gathers her brood to protect them.


Could there be a better image for describing the costliness of a mother’s love, the warmth and tenderness which at the same time require sorrow and sacrifice? And isn’t this also a call to see the feminine side of God, whom so easily we depict as a divine male autocrat upon his throne?

It may seem a world away from the Old Testament story of God’s covenant with Abraham. But there is a connection. If our Gospel reading shows us something of the Motherhood of God in Christ, then the story of Abram tells us of the yearning of a father who is without children. Abram has followed the command of God to leave his own country behind and to travel where he is directed. And it has paid off as he has found wealth in his household and flocks, the respect of his neighbours, victory in battle and the praise of the priest-king Melchizedek. But it all seems a hollow achievement. How can he be said to possess the land if he has no heir to inherit it? That is the question Abram puts to God. And the answer is given in the strange events we read this morning. The sacrifice of the heifer, ram, goat, turtle dove and pigeon, their cutting up and arrangement on the ground, and then in the darkness a smoking pot and flaming torch pass between them. If it seems strange to the point of weirdness, we shouldn’t miss the point for Abram – that this is something about the mystery of God’s way, something beyond words and understanding, but in which God acts and his presence is felt. It’s a unique event - there is nothing quite like it anywhere else in the Bible. Rituals of sacrifice are frequently recorded, but here there is no priest – and Abram quite possibly sleeps through it all. But perhaps there is a resonance in the account hundreds of years later of God’s journeying with the Israelites for 40 years in the desert as they travelled from slavery in Egypt to the Promised Land – there God’s presence is recognised in a pillar of cloud by day and a fire by night. Cloud and fire, smoke and flaming torch speak of the presence of God with his people, they are a promise in the direst of circumstances and leanest of days that God does not give up on us. Even in our weakness and when we seem to have lost all our bearings, he is there – whether we recognise it or not.

So in a strange covenant, God makes his promise to Abram. All this land between the Nile and the Euphrates he will give to Abraham’s descendants. That in itself is a promise to think about. Some have wished to argue that God’s will is for the creation of a greater Israel, a modern Jewish nation dominating the Middle East and extending from half-way across Egypt through Jordan and Syria into the heart of Iraq. Others have argued that it is so unthinkable that there is no real place at all for a Jewish state. Perhaps what is required is to remember that Abraham would in the event have two sons. Not only Isaac from whom the Israelites would trace their ancestry, but also Ishmael – his son by a concubine, but no less a son, no less the inheritor of God’s promise, and the one regarded as the ancestor of the Arab peoples.

The point is that God makes promises, and is faithful to his promise – more faithful than often we realise, and with an effect greater than often we recognise. All will be called: Israelite / Israeli and Arab; Jew, Christian and Muslim. And that promise is made real in Jesus who is ready to die to give us life. As Anselm’s Song of Christ’s Goodness concludes:

Despair turns to hope through your sweet goodness;
through your gentleness, we find comfort in fear.

Your warmth gives life to the dead,
your touch makes sinners righteous.

Lord Jesus, in your mercy, heal us;
in your love and tenderness, remake us.

In your compassion, bring grace and forgiveness,
for the beauty of heaven, may your love prepare us.

Gather your little ones to you, O God,
as a hen gathers her brood to protect them.




Where are you in this picture?

Lent 5 Year C - 25.iii.2007

Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Isaiah 43.16-21;
Philippians 3.4b-14;
John 12.1-8.



What we have in our Gospel reading this morning is – I think – a model of the Church. All the people involved in the story are followers of Jesus. We see how they’re drawn together by their common feeling for Jesus. We see how they seem to want the best for him and to help him in his aims. We see how they get on with each other. But we also see how they don’t get on… the misunderstandings which so easily spoil people’s relationships… the complaints which wound through their insensitivity… the question whether people can accept it when they’re wrong – and who’s going to tell them? – and how do you go about putting people right anyway?

I say this story of the anointing of Jesus is a model for the Church. I wonder if you can see yourself somewhere in the story? Jesus is met together with the people who are closest to him. Those who are named include that little family who seem to have given him so much hospitality: Lazarus – whom Jesus has just raised from the dead; his sister Martha – who is displaying her usual characteristic of running around seeing that everything is done just right, that all the food is ready and probably the last course has already been washed up; and the other sister, Mary, who we find elsewhere content simply to sit at the feet of Jesus and to listen to him. Only one other person is mentioned – Judas Iscariot, who looks after the money which Jesus and his followers need. Perhaps there were other disciples too, but there’s quite enough to be going on with with these four. So I can come back to my question: where would you see yourself in that room?

Would you be running around like Martha, anxious to look after your guest, making sure that Jesus has everything he needs, that the house has been tidied, the food is hot, trying to ensure that nothing is left to chance?

Might you feel like Lazarus? We never really get to know him as a character, but we can say this: he’s someone who’s been given a lot of attention – not just the younger brother of the two caring sisters, but someone who’s been nursed in his recent illness and then amazingly liberated from the tomb in which he’d been dead and buried; and now he must simply be sitting there, amazed at everything that’s happened. Lazarus is not someone who has had to do anything in particular; he simply needs to be, to accept what has been done for him. Simply accepting what others do for you can be difficult – can you do it? can you accept the love which God freely reveals for you?

But it’s Mary of Bethany who becomes the centre of attention. Who could be like her as she takes this costly perfume, anoints Jesus’ feet with it and then wipes his feet with her hair? It’s an action which is at the same time extravagant and loving, wasteful and profound in revealing the extent of her feeling for Jesus. We’re not told why she does it. But we might ask ourselves, what can prompt me to show my love for Jesus? What has he done for me? What response might I make to him? – even before he asks anything of me…

But I suspect that many of us would think that Mary’s gesture was rather over-the-top, out of place, or attention-grabbing… Or, like Judas, we might look at the sheer waste. All that money which she’d spent on perfume which then she just pours away – it could have been put to far better use. If she has to anoint Jesus’ feet, couldn’t she use just a bit? It’s money that could be used for charity - or put in the collection - or kept in the bank…

The writer of this Gospel passage tells us that Judas reacted this way because he was a thief. Perhaps John tells us this with the benefit of hindsight, knowing that Judas would in the end betray Jesus. But many of us might feel some sympathy for Judas’s response. He’s the one who has to look after the money, to make the accounts add up. He knows what’s right and wrong. Judas is the one who works to regulations and accounting requirements. And he can’t restrain himself. He misses the reality of what is going on in this act of love demonstrated by Mary. He can see only the problem – the sheer waste. And he opens his mouth and says what he feels, regardless of the hurt it might cause, heedless of the fact that Jesus lets Mary anoint him.

Too many of us, I guess, are like that. And the fact is that we are the people Jesus really needs. Judas might get a bad press, but someone was needed who would hold the purse strings. We need people in our churches who can work out priorities, decide what is truly important, make savings on the rest. We live in a society where we have to live with the rules – get them wrong and someone will put us right.

But of course there are ways to put people right… You can jump in with both feet like Judas. Or you can stop for a time and ponder, what is really going on here? We can see the waste – or we can see the love. We can put people right – and show people just how wrong we are ourselves – or we can work for what is truly right and good.

This weekend I’ve put up the notices for our Annual Parochial Church Meeting, where we’ll elect members of the Church Council and Churchwardens. The meeting’s not for another four weeks so you’ve got plenty of time to think about it. It can be incredibly difficult to persuade people to stand for these positions, so I’ll start saying now just how important they are. We need people who will serve this parish and congregation by dedicated service. And in the case of Wardens and PCC members that can entail long meetings and an awareness of rules and regulations. It does require above all a concern for the stewardship of our resources – and still more a love for Christ’s people. And that means we have to work out how to balance these two: stewardship of things and love of people.

When I went to Rome a couple of weeks ago it was to take part in a course on Benedictine Spirituality. We visited places associated with the life of St. Benedict who lived 1,500 years ago at the time when the Roman Empire ended and society collapsed into general chaos. He’s regarded as the founder of western monasticism. But we didn’t go on the course to play at being monks or for history lessons. In many ways the uncertainties of society in Benedict’s time were similar to our own. And as he found a religious community of monks forming around him, he was all too aware of the tensions entailed in living and getting on with other people. It’s said that one group of monks tried to poison him, and it took a couple of attempts to establish a settled community in which his way of life could flourish.

Benedict’s community never got very big in his own lifetime. But what he did leave behind was a Rule of life for his followers which inspires people to this day. You don’t need to be a monk to learn from it. Benedict called it a “little rule for beginners” – and he wrote it knowing a lot about human nature and the difficulties of living together. There’s one chapter (31) entitled “What kind of man the Cellarer of the Monastery should be.” The Cellarer was the person who looked after the cellar and everything in it – so in some ways he had the responsibility that Judas exercised for the disciples or that various officers of our church and its council are charged with. Benedict wrote this about the Cellarer:

he should be “prudent, of mature character, temperate, not a great eater, not proud, not headstrong, not rough-spoken, not lazy, not wasteful, but a God-fearing man who may be like a father to the whole community. Let him have charge of everything… (but) Let him not vex the brethren. If any brother happen to make an unreasonable demand, he should not vex him with a contemptuous denial, but reasonably and humbly refuse the improper request… Above all things let him have humility, and if he has nothing else to give, let him give a good word…”

There’s much more… but you can feel the tensions of care for things and love for people. It’s something we all need to work at. The Cellarer takes his cue from the Abbot of the monastery – and all the monks take a vow of obedience to the Abbot. So it was a highlight when we met the Abbot of St. Paul’s outside the Walls. Abbot Edmund Power is only the second English abbot in that monastery’s history (the last one was in the year 948 – but time is a relative concept to Benedictines) and he’s the softest spoken person you could imagine. He spoke to us about the vow of obedience. It’s not something to be imposed but rather something that grows out of our relationship with God. So the Abbot (anyone who aspires to running things) must himself be obedient, and his responsibility towards the other members of his community is not to impose obedience but to draw it from them. True understanding requires dialogue and relationship, and all of it mediated through a profound process of listening and prayer.

What can we learn from this about our life together? What can we learn if we meditate on these themes in relation to today’s Gospel?

I’ve said that I think this Gospel story reveals a sort of model of the Church. There’s the busy person, anxious to get everything right and keep the show on the road. There’s the person who simply needs to accept what has been done for them, to know the love of Christ, even if they’re a bit bewildered by it. There’s the person who knows how to love – and puts it into practice in a way that can be quite shocking. And there’s the person who can be shocked – who knows there’s a right and (even more) a wrong way to do everything. Where are you in the picture?


What's on your mind?... Follow me!

3rd Sunday of Easter - Year C

22nd April 2007

The Revd. Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Acts 9.1-6;
John 21.1-19



There’s so much you could say about this morning’s readings - so much that you might wonder where to begin. But if I can summarise what I want to say this morning, it’s this: There’s more to Easter than an empty tomb. And there’s more that should be on our minds this morning than the Annual Meeting which follows this service - though nevertheless, I hope you’ll stay!

More than an empty tomb… We left off our reading of the resurrection accounts last week with the appearance of Jesus to Thomas - who’d previously missed Jesus on the first Easter evening, who found belief so hard, who needed to put his fingers into the print of the nails in Jesus’ hands and the wounds in his side…. but then didn’t need to, because he found himself simply exclaiming, “My Lord and my God!” And that chapter ends telling you that there was much more could have been written about Jesus, only this is enough to help people believe. St. Paul tells us of some of the events that go unrecorded in the Gospel. There’s an appearance to 500 of the disciples all together. Then to James, who takes up the leadership of the Church in Jerusalem. Then there’s that encounter of which we read in Acts today: years later Paul experiencing a blinding vision of Christ while he’s journeying to Damascus with the avowed aim of persecuting Christians; this for Paul is no less a Resurrection appearance than the rest. But now we’re back in the Gospel of John - just where we left off last week. We’d thought the writer was finished but then he adds this chapter with the disciples fishing and Jesus coming to them on the lakeside. Why… when John seemed to have finished his account?... I read last week the suggestion that this chapter is a sort of coda or epilogue not just to John’s Gospel, but to all of the Gospels. And the writer went on to suggest it might be a bit like one of those films which ends with all the main characters of a film in reflective mood in the final scene as they sit down and have a cup of tea - I wondered what sort of films the writer has seen recently!!! But I think what he was suggesting is that this chapter is here to say - look, it doesn’t all end with the empty tomb or a miraculous encounter; life goes on; Jesus is known as risen as people go about their everyday life and work…

I said there should be other things on our minds this morning than the church’s Annual Meeting. Yet nevertheless we know how important it is. The minds of some of us at least have been pretty much exercised by the question of whether we’ll get the right number of people standing for the PCC, who’ll do the job in a way that will give us new vision… We’ll be reviewing the past year - including our finances. And we might have a hint of what there is to look forward to. A problem in looking back is that so often people tend to dwell on what went wrong, what could have been better, what resources we really need if we’re to do the job properly. That could have been the case in today’s Gospel encounter of Jesus and Peter - a sort of de-briefing in which Peter is asked to reflect on where he went wrong, how he let Jesus down, whether he really needed to cut off someone’s ear in the Garden of Gethsemane, and why - when he was challenged - he denied all knowledge of the man he’d called a Messiah whom he’d never desert. We’ll come back to this encounter… But let’s just note for the moment that this is not what Jesus does. And for ourselves, let’s recognise that looking back over the last year we need first of all to strike a note of appreciation and thankfulness… for so much that has been done, so much achieved, so much hard work freely given…

It’s the most human thing that we live in the present moment with all that’s on our minds… and that might mean with whatever is weighing us down. Then we need to remember Jesus’ words that each day has troubles enough of its own… yet still we might be amazed to find ourselves able to make leaps of the imagination which were quite unforeseen.

That’s what we find with the disciples in today’s Gospel. Their immediate focus is that they’ve gone fishing… and they’re not being very successful. These are fishermen who can’t catch fish. Then after a night on the lake, a figure appears on the shore who shouts, “Cast the net to the right side.” They don’t know who it is, but they try it anyway - and make a catch so large they can’t haul it in. It’s only then that Peter realises, “It is the Lord!” They’ve heard the word of Jesus. They’ve discovered the risen Christ in their midst. The question it leaves us with is, are we ready to hear? Are we ready for the encounter with Jesus? At his farewell service in Durham Cathedral last Thursday the Bishop of Jarrow summed up in one short sentence what we can recognise to be the secret of his ministry: “Jesus is the template and touchstone of my Christian faith.” As he went on to say, it’s what gets him out of bed to meet each day - that and the money… and only one of those statements we know is true.

Bishop John identified two other qualities which are essential in Christian living. One is gratitude. As he put it: “Our lives are lived in thankfulness, not in duty - ransomed, healed, restored, forgiven…” What more need be said? Well, Bishop John said it when he spoke about the grace which is essential in sustaining us: “Grace-filled lives are the best advert for belief - and the resurrection.” Can we lay hold on that? Grace is to speak of what God gives us as a gift. It comes freely, not grudgingly… It’s there for the taking, if only we will reach out and grasp it. And it declares new life… resurrection.

That’s what we see in this account of the appearance of the risen Christ at the Sea of Galilee. What does Jesus give these hopeless fisherman who can’t catch fish, heedless disciples who had deserted their master? The answer is not a lecture, but breakfast. They come to the shore cold and wet, hauling the catch he has provided, and find that already he has the fish ready to feed them. Why are we told that their catch is one of 153 fish? Some commentators have said that’s how many nations or languages there were thought to be - so the number stands for all the people ready to hear the Gospel. There are obscure explanations like 153 is the sum of all the numbers up to 17… 1+2+3+4 up to 17. You can work that out yourself and see if it’s true, but what does it prove? Perhaps I’m most taken by the thought that they were so embarrassed at their past conduct that they couldn’t look Jesus in the face - so they counted the fish instead, and that’s how many there were. But the fact is that Jesus doesn’t rub their noses in their failure. He simply beckons them, come and eat. It’s a reminder of how true George Herbert’s poem, Love III, really is:


Love bade me welcome: yet my soul drew back,
Guilty of dust and sin.
But quick-eyed Love, observing me grow slack
From my first entrance in,
Drew nearer to me, sweetly questioning,
If I lacked any thing.

"A guest," I answered, "worthy to be here:"
Love said, "You shall be he."
"I the unkind, ungrateful? Ah my dear,
I cannot look on thee."
Love took my hand, and smiling did reply,
"Who made the eyes but I?"

"Truth Lord, but I have marr'd them: let my shame
Go where it does deserve."
"And know you not," says Love, "who bore the blame?"
"My dear, then I will serve."
"You must sit down," says Love, "and taste my meat:"
So I did sit and eat.


If last week’s Gospel was about the exploration of the wounds of Jesus, with Thomas wanting to put his fingers into the print of the nails and his hand into Jesus’ wounded side, then this week’s is about the healing of wounds. No longer the physical marks of the nails and the spear, but the inter-personal damage which can go so much deeper, what Peter is unable to say, but for which he needs to find a voice. Jesus takes Peter to one side, not for recrimination as to all his failings, but to ask him a gentle question: “Simon, son of John, do you love me…?” Jesus doesn’t berate Peter in order to put him right, but simply draws forth what was always there. And he gets his answer, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” Living the Christian life is about giving expression to love… giving it a voice and putting it into practice - so Peter is charged, “feed my sheep… take care of my lambs.”

The resurrection appearances don’t end with the accounts in the Bible. They’re to be a daily experience for Christ’s people in our own time. Each day we need to be able to recognise the risen Christ speaking to us. His encouragement - try casting your net over there; his nourishing love, even as he fed the disciples by the lakeside; his drawing forth of our love with his gentle questioning - do you love me? where does your heart draw you?; his call to care for others; and those final words which he speaks to us all, “Follow me.”




A new heaven, a new earth... love one another...

5th Sunday of Easter - Year C

6th May 2007

The Revd. Martin Jackson,
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Acts 11.1-18;
Revelation 21.1-6;
John 13.31-35



Jesus’ words which you’ve just heard in today’s Gospel reading:

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.

And then there are those words you heard in our second reading:

I… saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God…

It’s the vision of the Kingdom which God promises us - God in his holiness. But the words of Jesus remind us that being a Christian is more than believing in a heaven which might be caricatured as “pie in the sky when you die.” It’s about recognising the reality of the vision and the difference that the Christian hope makes now. We believe with St. John in his wonderful Revelation that there is a hope of a new heaven and a new earth. And we live out the reality of our calling by acting on the new commandment of Jesus: “Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” The vision of holiness goes together - inseparably - with the life we lead now.

As most of you know, I was in Rome during March for a course organised by the Anglican Centre in that city. As the friend I went with said, the course itself exceeded expectation. It was well worth it for the insights it gave us on the specialist subject of Benedictine Spirituality - what we can learn from the Rule of St. Benedict, and how the provision he made for the monks who followed him in the early 6th Century is relevant to us in the lives ordinary Christians lead 1500 years later. But in many ways the real value was in the experiences we hadn’t paid for in the course fee: the other people who were doing the course - including participants from Australia (Roman Catholic lay women), the United States (Anglican and Lutheran clergy), England (we felt quite a minority), Uganda (a Diocesan Secretary) and the Congo (one of their bishops); the people we happened to meet - at an audience with the Pope (me and 6,000 other people!) I found myself sitting next to a former Franciscan friar whom I first met nearly 30 years ago, and another priest I bump into from time to time who happened to be a friend of the friend I was travelling with; and of course the sheer sense of the place - a wonderful city, and staying in the Casa del Clero we rubbed shoulders with Vatican officials, bishops and clergy from many nations.

One of the places I’d wanted to go back to was the Basilica of Santa Maria in Trastevere. I’d visited it briefly in the early 1990s. It’s in a poor neighbourhood of Rome, and as I recall the square that Sunday morning 14 years ago was pretty well deserted except for a few lads kicking a football around - sometimes against the wall of the church, which itself didn’t look very exceptional from the outside. Its doors were rather large and forbidding, but I’d pushed one open and was hit by what I can only describe as a wave of beauty. The place had been packed, it was full of colour and the singing was a wall of wonderful sound. A bit, perhaps, like what St. John in his Revelation seems to be describing as he speaks of the vision of the new Jerusalem? The most disappointing thing about that experience was that the service was almost over - the vision passed. But I was left with the sense of what had seemed so unpromising, a bit shabby, and poor on the outside - and the riches contained within. I wanted to go back, so I was delighted to find that participants in my course had an opportunity to meet someone from the community which maintains the life of the church and then to join them for worship one evening.

What I didn’t know on my previous visit to Rome is that the church has become the headquarters of the Sant’Egidio Community - a lay movement which began in the 1970s and now has 20,000 members in countries around the world, 5,000 of them in Rome itself. This isn’t an organisation whose activities you join in simply when you feel like it. Every evening its members come together for prayer, and the prayer is only one of the manifestations of the faith which motivates them. In fact the evening before our formal meeting we’d already encountered the Community in another expression of its work. We’d gone out to eat at a restaurant called Gli Amici, “The Friends.” The food was excellent, the wine was reasonable in quality and price, and I’d recommend it highly. But what you soon realised was that this was a rather special restaurant. The waiters might have struck the casual visitor as just a bit different from others. And the menu told you why… As it put it, the staff were people with disabilities - together with their volunteer friends from the Sant’Egidio Community. But apart from that… it was all quite unexceptional. There were no compromises over standards, no artificially low prices, no sense that this was a churchy enterprise put on in a seedy church hall. It was just another restaurant. But one where people who otherwise wouldn’t have had the chance were given dignity in the service they could offer to paying guests. People were earning a living, who otherwise might have been thought not capable. And everyone was having a good time.

That’s just one of the many things the Sant’Egidio Community does… A few years ago the Community got into the news when it brokered a settlement which finally brought peace to Mozambique after years of civil war in that country. High level diplomacy had failed. But members of the community which had begun on the streets of Rome trying to provide food and warmth for homeless people had simply gone out of their way to befriend the leaders of the warring parties. Then they invited them to Rome, not to be put up as official delegations in expensive hotels but to stay in the homes of ordinary members of the community. They provided simple hospitality, won their trust, and people talked until they agreed to stop fighting. It’s a remarkable story. And it only worked, I think, because its members are so unassuming. The community’s leader was an 18 year old student when he started the movement. The man we met had grown middle-aged along with him in over 30 years of community membership. We asked him what he did, and he said he was a Professor in one of Rome’s universities - but during the late afternoon and evening he manned their switchboard as his particular contribution… though he also gave us an hour of his time, translated for us in the service we attended, and on the way to the church stepped aside to help a homeless person on the street. When it was time for Vespers, the ancient church simply filled up, mainly with young people. And before they meet for prayer - which is mostly sung both beautifully and spontaneously - many of the community are involved in the soup kitchens of Rome. Service of the poor goes along with worship and prayer. It’s seen most clearly when - on Christmas Day - the Community clears the pews out of the church to make way for tables on which they provide Christmas lunch for the needy.

As it happens I received the latest newsletter from the Sant’Egidio Community just yesterday. It starts by speaking of signs of Resurrection in a world where there are many crosses still standing. And then, unsensationally, it reports the signing of a peace agreement in the Ivory Coast for which the Community has most recently worked and prayed. I wonder how many of us even knew about the violence and civil strife in that West African country, let alone the vision and determination of these people who had worked to bring it to an end.

We live in a country with a lot of news coverage, but it’s coverage of only a limited range. While acres of newsprint obsess about whether Prince Harry might serve with the armed forces in Iraq, we lose our perspective on the blighting of millions of lives in that country - not to mention all those wars and places of need which simply go unreported. Perhaps someone needs to remind the Prince that the thing so far he has achieved of real value is to work in his gap year with AIDS orphans in Lesotho: he could do far more by keeping the plight of that forgotten country in people’s minds than by toting a gun around Basra while under the protection of the SAS. And it’s not just the elite who have got priorities wrong: I was struck by the coverage of the earthquake in Kent last week, in which a few chimney pots fell down and a car was damaged by a collapsing garden wall - “small earthquake in South East England,” the headline might have read; “nobody at all hurt.” All credit to the local Salvation Army who don’t seem to have been at all stretched by the needs of those evacuated from their homes. But you can’t help but be amused by the person said to be in shock at being roused from her bed at 8.20a.m.!

Where are the real needs beyond our self-obsessing and selfishness? Who are the people who really need our concern in a society so caught up in the cult of celebrity? The glorious vision of St. John the Divine is of “a new heaven and a new earth.” The two go together. We are called to holiness - but that goes with meeting people in their need. It’s not a task for other people. It starts simply as, where and when we put faith into practice in our daily lives. But it demands some vision too – to recognise that God is a God of life and love who is not tied down by our rules and expectations. That’s how we are to understand our Gospel reading today. Jesus spoke to his disciples as fellow-Jews, who knew there were 613 commandments for them to live by. He must have had that in mind when he spoke of adding to the commandments: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another.”

Love like Jesus, and we’ll know the extent of that love which searches us out, which acknowledges our frailty and failings, which brings us forgiveness and challenges our stubborness, which goes finally even to the Cross for people who cannot comprehend that this is God’s way. This is the love which breaks the bounds of expectation. And it is this love – more than any set of rules, more than great knowledge of the scriptures or theology – this love which declares that we are Jesus’ disciples.


Pentecost - letting the Spirit pray in us

Pentecost Year C

27th May 2007

The Revd. Martin Jackson
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Acts 2.1-21;
Romans 5.14-17;
John 14.8-17, 25-27.



This is part of a conversation I recorded some time ago, when my children were rather younger than they are now. ‘So what happens at Christmas?’ ‘You get presents.’ ‘Well, who do we remember at Christmas?’ ‘Santa Claus.’ ‘Why do we celebrate Christmas?’ ‘So we can have a happy new year.’ (Increasing exasperation on my part, for this is a conversation in the Vicarage!) ‘So what do I do at Christmas?’ ‘You open the presents.’

I tried again on the subject of Easter. ‘What do we do at Easter?’ ‘We get Easter eggs….’ and so on.

These are the things that stick in the mind of five year olds. It doesn’t mean that the Christian story is forgotten. Just that there are certain things nearer the surface, and keenly anticipated by the children of an advertising and shopping culture. But what if were to ask adults, ‘What happens at Pentecost?’ We don’t give eggs or presents today. This year we can celebrate it with a Bank Holiday weekend - which means that congregations fall even lower than usual - but now we get the holiday only if the day after Pentecost falls on the last Monday in May. And of course we’ve even changed the name. We used to talk about the Whit weekend. But now Whit Sunday has become Pentecost. I tried looking up the word Pentecost in an encyclopaedia on the Internet. And I found it – a rather brief entry, and some cross references too – to an article about Pentecostal Church and to another about a Baptist minister (and I didn’t look them up). And there were further references to topics which the computer thought must be similar – like Pocahontas, the Native American heroine made famous by the recent Walt Disney film and video. Ask most people what they make of Pentecost, and I guess they can tell you more about Pocahontas.

The way I phrased my opening questions was quite careful. ‘What happens at Christmas?… What happens at Easter?….’ Maybe that’s why I got the answer about presents and eggs – they’re the things that we all get involved with in the here and now. Perhaps I should have asked, what happened at Christmas and Easter? – 2000 years ago that is. But the message of those two great Feasts cannot be locked up in the past – and still less so the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. We don’t mark this day by giving presents or any outward show, and perhaps that’s one reason why we miss its importance. It might read as an incident of some doubtful historical importance. But see what happens – and the difference it makes – and we realise that this is the event which both changes the whole outlook of the first Christians and then sustains them in their life together.

It’s called Pentecost because that happens to be the name of the Jewish feast when that small band of Christians met. Pentecost meaning fiftieth. The fiftieth day after the Feast of the Passover – for us the fiftieth day after Easter. We give this feast the name Whit Sunday because it was to become a major day for baptising converts into membership of the Church – new Christians who would present themselves in robes of white, so white or whit Sunday. And if Easter Day can be said to mark the birth of the Church, the first Whit Sunday, that first Pentecost, marked its Baptism. But not as we might get ready for the Baptism of a baby. No great weeks of planning. No guest lists drawn up or preparation sessions with the Vicar. No arguments over who the godparents should be. And it’s not something that happens during a formal service in Church….

Except that our reading from Acts tells us that these early Christians ‘were all gathered together in one place’ that day. So perhaps they were assembled for worship. But how many we can’t say – nor is there anything to say what they were expecting. Perhaps it’s just the twelve apostles – twelve again since Matthias had taken the place of Judas. It seems the disciples didn’t really know what they were to do. They knew Jesus to have risen from the dead. They’d heard his command to stay in Jerusalem. But they seemed rather lost as to what direction to take.

And there’s maybe some encouragement for us in this. So often we hear people ask, “so what can the Church do for me?” And today we get the answer, “absolutely nothing.” These first Christians seem to have nothing much going for them. They could have sat around and reminisced about the good old days with Jesus, but the memories would have faded. They could have gone on in the belief that the twelve apostles had some special understanding for others to admire, but the disciples themselves don’t seem to have been terribly admirable people, what with people like Peter blowing hot and cold, and the most recent recruit, Matthias, being notable for nothing more than getting chosen as an apostle. The difference is made – not by any qualities that those first Christians had in themselves – but by the Holy Spirit. They were together… ‘and suddenly from heaven there came a sound like the rush of a violent wind, and it filled the entire house where they were sitting. Divided tongues, as of fire, appeared among them, and a tongue rested on each of them...and all of them were filled with the Holy Spirit.’

Not what the Church can offer! But what can God offer the Church? Or rather what can God offer the world, and will the Church go along with it or get in the way? These first Christians don’t have the time to ask questions like that. They rush out, it seems, to start telling the crowds what has happened. And what has happened is not just that they have had an experience which they recognise as the pouring out of the Holy Spirit. It’s that suddenly it all makes sense! Everything is coming together. Now they see the truth of what they had believed as Jews… that God is at work in the lives of his people, even when they wander from his ways, even when things don’t go well, even when they’re forced into exile by other nations. Now they understand where Jesus fits in, as the one whose teaching, death and resurrection points to God’s work in their midst. And now they recognise that God will go on working through his Holy Spirit, poured out on them to give them a new boldness, to turn them from looking inwards to share their message urgently with all who will hear it – and God gives them the power to communicate, even with people who speak different languages, who follow different customs, and who live different lives.

But do we say, well… all this was a long time ago? What can we expect now? The fact is that those first Christians in Jerusalem on that first day of Pentecost didn’t expect the Holy Spirit to come upon them as he did. The Holy Spirit takes them by surprise. All they needed was to be in the right place at the right time. For us the message is that the Holy Spirit can make a difference in our lives too. Not that we can pin God down, to dictate how he should work, but we can at least be open to his work in us. Are we ready to pray so that God’s Holy Spirit can pray in us? St. Paul writes in this morning’s reading from Romans: ‘When we cry, “Abba, Father!” it is the Spirit of God bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God.’ In other words, to find the Holy Spirit working in us, we only have to call God our Father – and that’s to start praying in the most basic way, to say that prayer which Jesus gave to any who would follow him, to pray ‘Our Father…’ Do that, says St. Paul, and you’ll know the Spirit to be at work in you – you’ll discover what it means to be God’s children. And the Spirit himself binds us into the life of God. He lets us call God, ‘Abba... Father’ - as much his son or daughter as Christ himself. We simply need to make a start, and then we find that we are at one with God even as Jesus was one with God his Father. It’s a relationship which needs to be worked out, but it’s a relationship which is fundamental and cannot be broken.

The first day of Pentecost was just that - the first – a new beginning. How can we make a new start? It needn’t happen as dramatically as it did for those first disciples. Mother Teresa of Calcutta once told the story of a visit she made to a lonely old man in Melbourne, Australia:

‘I saw his room in a terrible state, and I wanted to clean his house, his room, and he kept on saying, “I’m all right”. But I repeated the same words, “You will be more all right if you will allow me to clean your place”, and at the end he allowed me. And there in that room there was a beautiful lamp covered with the dirt of many years, and I asked him, “Why do you not light your lamp?” Then I asked him, “Will you light the lamp if the Sisters come to see you?” He said, “Yes, if I hear a human voice I will do it”. And the other day he sent me word, “Tell my friend the light she has lit in my life is still burning.”’

Will we discover that lamp, perhaps hidden away and dusty, which can burn for us? Will we clean it and let it give light? Can we help others to find that light – perhaps with something as simple as the gift of a human voice or a helping hand to the lonely? Such a lamp, lit and burning, is the power of the Holy Spirit to change lives.


The point of being a Christian - God

Trinity Sunday – Year C

3rd June 2007

The Revd. Martin Jackson
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Proverbs 8.1-4,22-31;
Romans 5.1-5;
John 16.12-15


Some words of Jesus from today’s Gospel reading: “the Spirit will guide you into all truth... he will speak whatever he hears.... He will glorify me, because he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine....”

To speak of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one of the things that marks Christianity out from other religions. We do it continually in our worship. I do it at the start of a sermon. But start discussing why we do it - and what it means - and you can easily tie yourself in knots. This is where I want to say that it’s not just a matter of words. To speak of God the Holy Trinity, one God, known as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, is not just to complicate matters in the way you might think theologians enjoy. It’s to speak of the reality of God, and the life which God shares with this world and all its people. But that doesn’t make it any easier to find a way in.

One question I’ve been asking myself over the last few days is whether I ought to say anything about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the four year old taken from her parents’ holiday apartment in Portugal. And the fact is that I don’t have anything that can be said simply about it… about the pain her parents and wider family must feel, about the response felt by millions of people around the world, about the way the media is treating the story, and about what the family wants us to feel by keeping Madeleine in the news. We can say that Madeleine’s parents are people of great faith. But I can’t say just how that faith is going to help.

Except that the faith we profess needs to be worked out in human lives. Timothy Radcliffe puts it this way in his book, “What is the point of being a Christian?”

The truth is simple, but unless it is the simplicity that has passed through the complexity of human experience, then it is a childish simplicity, a strident and inhuman simplicity, rather than the simplicity that we dimly glimpse in God.

In other words, a simple faith is going to be demanding - and that’s true as we try to make sense of the world… as we try to make sense of God. What we need to do is to try and make sense of both together.

This takes me back to a story I saw on television years ago, but upon which I need to keep reflecting. It’s about two children and their family. Like the McCanns they were Catholics, though no great deal was made about their religion. The documentary, "Katie and Eilish" was about two sisters - but they were more than sisters, because they were Siamese twins joined from the shoulder down, with their own arms, but joined so tightly that they were in a sort of perpetual embrace, sharing a chest cavity in which two hearts beat, and then lower down with one set of hips and therefore one pair of legs. The viewer might straightaway see the tragedy of the situation which they and their family shared - how awful that this should be! how could a loving God allow this to happen? But their father's first words at their birth were, "Aren't they beautiful?" And the overwhelming sense throughout the film was of a happy family in which the twins contributed much joy. Of course there were questions and dilemmas which had to be faced, most notably "Should the twins be surgically separated?" And the film followed the family through their consultations with specialists, through months of preparations until finally the massive operation did take place at Great Ormond Street Hospital. As the operation began, the cameras stopped, and the television screen went black and silent. It made the point that no one could know the outcome… and the outcome was that one twin survived while the other died - her heart had been weak and could not stand the strain of surgery. When the film ended I found I couldn't speak; it had affected me so greatly. The excellence of the film was not that it dealt in sentiment, which is perhaps one of the emotions which lies closest to the surface in human beings, but that it conveyed so powerfully the sense of being part of the children's family; and it left not only a sense of sadness, but still more a feeling of wonder at the love which motivated these people, of the happiness they shared, of the faith which strengthened them and of their sheer normality in the most testing of circumstances.

As Christians a basic question we face in every situation is, "Where is God in all this?" Whatever answer we give, God must be allowed to touch our human hearts, and open them to respond to the warmth of his Spirit. But still it might be asked, why does God permit things to go wrong in our world and in our lives which are beyond our control, which are not the result of human wrong-doing, malice or neglect, but which are natural disaster, illness or genetic disorder? What is God doing if he is truly the Creator of all things, if we say that he looked upon his created universe and "saw that it was good"? This is a question which will not go away for Christians who begin the Creed each Sunday by saying, "We believe in one God, the Father, the almighty, maker of heaven and earth...."

Perhaps there’s a sense that Jesus’ disciples thought that this almighty God had let things get too far out of hand when they ask, "Lord, let us see the Father and then we shall be satisfied." If only they could see something which would allay their fears, which would allow them to put their doubts to one side! And their words have echoed on the lips of millions of people since: "if only I could have a sign, then I could believe;" "if only there were some more evidence that God really is on our side!"

The answer Jesus gives the disciples is the answer we all need to hear, even though it doesn't give what they - and we - ask for. “Let us see the Father,” they had asked, but Jesus replies, “To have seen me is to have seen the Father.” Jesus tells them to make sure that they are truly seeking after the whole picture. The danger is that they have a preconceived idea of God and of how he works, and it is one that can only lead them astray - mention God, and they think of a divine potentate who sits on a throne in heaven, and who can change everything with a twitch of his celestial finger. And I wonder if in the last two thousand years we have really moved on much further than that in our idea of God. But there’s more to God than someone who is merely “Almighty”. He’s more than “Our Father.” For a start, look at me, says Jesus - and you’ll see the Father. And then he goes on in the Gospel reading we use today: “I still have many things to say, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you…” There’s more than we can grasp or cope with. There’s more than we can take in. There’s the need to wait, to be patient, to recognize that God is bigger than our human understanding.

God "the Father"..."Almighty God" ...these are only part of the picture and this we remember today, on Trinity Sunday. God is God, but God is known as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. "God is a family" - these are words I’ve found helpful to my understanding - and this is something I find in that story of Katie and Eilish. On one level, their story was one of tragedy and sadness, on another about medical skill and survival, but most it was about people and the way they relate. How the two twin sisters related to one another in one body but with distinct personalities. How they related to their other brothers and sisters. How their parents cared for them as individuals and as a part of the whole family. And how the bond of love which they all shared made for such happiness and such a matter-of-fact approach to their lives.

If we can learn from the family life of people like these, and then speak of God as a "family", then we can begin to see that when we speak of God we are so often speaking of but one facet of his being, because we can never take in the whole picture. And that is not something to be worried about! How many of us know just what makes other people and other families tick, that makes their relationships work? We don't need to know, though we can be thankful for what we glimpse, and for the love and fulfilment they enable us to share. And so it is with God. Jesus tells the disciples, "To have seen me is to have seen the Father." They need not worry about God in his heaven. It is sufficient that they have encountered him in the flesh, in Jesus, living among them, dying for them and rising to give them the promise of new life. But neither is Jesus the whole story. Always he points beyond himself to the purpose of God, whose loving will is to create, redeem and sanctify his people.

There's a danger on Trinity Sunday that we get bogged down in all the talk about how God can be Father, Son and Holy Spirit, three Persons, yet one God,… and the end result is to leave us with a doctrine rather than a God who is alive and active. None of us can ever fully understand God, still less explain how he works. But we see him at work. We may have far to go in working out the implications of that faith, but the promise is that God will travel with us. That is what enabled the priest and poet George Herbert to write this prayer for Trinity Sunday, and it can enable us too in our daily lives:

Lord, who hast form'd me out of mud,
And hast redeem'd me through thy blood,
And sanctifi'd me to do good;

Purge all my sins done heretofore:
For I confess my heavy score,
And I will strive to sin no more.

Enrich my heart, mouth, hands in me,
With faith, with hope, with charity;
That I may run, rise, rest with thee.




Abusing, judging and remembering human dignity


Trinity 2 – Year C

17th June 2007 (Proper 6)

The Revd. Martin Jackson
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

2 Samuel 11.26-12.10,13-15;
Galatians 2.15-21;
Luke 7.36-8.3



I’m struck by two news stories you’ll find on the front of this week’s Consett Advertiser. The lead story has the title “Police shoot runaway dog.” This was a story that was on regional television news as well. The dog was a mastiff, newly purchased by its owner, and as he let it out of the car to go into his home it ran off. He searched for it for over a week, and the dog was cornered, at which point it bit his 70 year old mother-in-law who’d been helping look for the dog. The wound needed stitches, and I remember that the television news said the lady was lucky not to lose her sight. At this point the police came into the picture. The dog was tracked to a cemetery and an armed police officer shot it.

This is where the Advertiser tells us something new. The owner pleaded with the police not to shoot. When they did he then shouted and swore at them. After they calmed him down he said, “It is disgusting and I cannot believe that the law allows them to do this…” And then it was reported, “The decision to kill the dog was immediately condemned by the community, some of whom shouted abuse at the police after hearing the shots.” One woman was reported as saying, “What the police have done is disgusting. It is too brutal and not right. It was a defenceless animal and I am quite saddened by this.” Now the owner is apparently seeing his solicitor about legal action against the police. His are the last words reported in the article: “This is supposed to be a country which loves its dogs.”

I read this story with a sense of incredulity. I have to say I’m sorry for the dog, but its misfortune really began when its owner failed to keep it under control. Once it had bitten someone its fate was pretty well sealed. Even the fact that it was the owner’s mother-in-law that got bitten can’t be used as a plea of mitigation. What is really amazing to me is that the article itself didn’t express any sense that the dog was an obvious danger to other people. If it could bite a woman searching with family and friends, then who else could it attack? If it continued to roam free, how long would it be before it attacked a child? If it went back to the owner, how long would it be before it attacked a child? If the police had it cornered, how were they supposed to get hold of it? The owner was obviously upset, but could he really expect (as he said) that the police should have gone looking for the dog as soon as he reported it missing, when he and his family couldn’t find it? And as for the onlookers who shouted abuse at the police, hadn’t they rather lost the human dimension? - how much more outrage would they express if the police had allowed the dog to go on to cause more injury?

All too easily we get wrapped up in our own way of looking at life. We invent our own categories for right and wrong. And because we can’t see beyond the boundaries we make for ourselves we get trapped into selfishness, disregard of others and finally loss of a true sense of humanity.

That’s what happens in today’s Old Testament reading. We actually miss the first part of the story - and these days that first part might get portrayed in fiction or film as a story of “true love.” King David, out on the roof of his palace, looks into the neighbours’ garden and sees a beautiful woman, Bathsheba, bathing. The husband, Uriah, is away from home - actually fighting for David in one of his many wars - and the king contrives to meet her. They get passionate, they move on to the bedroom… And perhaps we have to say we don’t know what is going on this relationship. Society expected that the king would sleep with lots of women. Perhaps Bathsheba’s husband had been away from home for a long time. Maybe her marriage was unhappy and she felt that David offered her the love she needed. But that’s when we see how we can fool ourselves as to what love really is. Bathsheba finds that she’s pregnant, and David decides the best course is to fool her husband into believing that the child is his. So Uriah is called home from the war. But he’s a man of honour. He won’t go into his own home, never mind sleep with his wife, while the rest of his comrades are left fighting in the field. David tries and tries to get him to go home. Whatever love he had for Bathsheba now produces the fruit of deception, and when he fails he turns to murder. Uriah is sent into the thick of battle, and an order is given for the rest of his line to fall back, leaving him to be slaughtered.

We think we know what love is - but so often it’s just what we want for ourselves. We pursue it oblivious to the effect on others, without regard to their feelings, to the damage inflicted on others, without any real concern for life itself. What should be an act of love distorts into deception and then a killing. It takes Nathan the prophet to confront the king and bring this home to him. And he only gets through to him by telling the story of the rich man who takes the poor man’s lamb to feed a guest. Is it significant that it’s a story about a defenceless animal that touches David’s heart? “This man deserves to die; he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing, and because he had no pity.” …. “You are the man…” Nathan has to tell him.
What does it take to make us recognise how we treat others?

The other story on the Advertiser’s front page this week is about the lap-dancing club that’s due to open in Consett at the end of next month. Over a thousand people have objected to the club where men pay women to perform lewd private dances for them - the paper says “topless dances” but I guess that doesn’t do justice what’s actually involved. Again the paper misses the point. The only reason it gives from objectors is that, “People fear it will lead to a rise in anti-social behaviour and rowdiness in the town.” Well, with all that goes on there already it’s hardly surprising if the objections are dismissed on these grounds.

The real point is that it seems that you can’t make an objection on the grounds of moral behaviour or human dignity - and these are the real cause for concern. What does it say about the owners’ and the clients’ view of women if they feel that it’s OK for men to pay for acts of sexual gratification? What does it say about their view of men? The owner, “businessman Sukhdev Singh Gill” says he’s received a lot of interest from women who want to work at the club, and he’s already taken 20 on. So does that make it OK? Should we allow people to demean themselves? Should we allow men to see women as people who can demean themselves? And doesn’t it just all add up to distort still further the outlook in our society where people can treat other people as objects? Everything is permissible so long as you pay for it? Disorderly conduct and drunken violence may not get any worse on the street outside the club. But there are still more insidious forms of damage which will be the outcome.

I can’t help but feel that our District Council and its Planning Committee have been rather spineless in their response to the application for the club. Perhaps they could have said that something more than the letter of the law is important in a case like this.

I wonder about the women who will “perform.” What I do hope is that we’ll all remember that they are women, people who deserve dignity and respect. Whether you agree with what they do or not it’s important to do more than simply condemn - that route leads us to treating them as objects in just the way that their customers do. These are people. And that’s the lesson in today’s Gospel reading. A woman comes into the house of a Pharisee where Jesus is being entertained, and throws herself down to weep over his feet, dry the tears from his feet with her hair and then anoint them. In a similar story the disciples complain about the waste of precious ointment which could have been sold to help the poor. Here it’s different. The Pharisee objects, because he knows what sort of woman she is - “a sinner,” and that’s a catch-all term he could use for anyone he might despise. Perhaps she’s a prostitute, perhaps these days she might earn a living as a lap-dancer. But he doesn’t see the woman herself. He sees the “kind of woman,” and Jesus should know “what kind of woman she is,” and keep his distance. People have made of this woman an object, and Simon the Pharisee is just the latest in a line who have queued up to do so.

It’s Jesus who recognises that there’s something else. She is a sinner - but he doesn’t want to keep her trapped in the sin. That’s why he can forgive her. Recognise the sin, but love the sinner. The woman might have been trapped by her way of life, but in Jesus she sees someone who can set her free. So from her heart - in her actions - there flows forth love. And redeeming love is what she finds in Jesus. “I tell you, her sins, which were many, have been forgiven; hence she has shown great love. But the one to whom little is forgiven, forgives little.”

What do we know about right and wrong? The Pharisee of course knows plenty. But we need to know still more about people and about God, and about what allows us to call people God’s children. We need to know about forgiveness - how to give it and want and receive it. We need to see that people are not objects but individuals created in God’s image and called to his ongoing work of love.


Celebrating Mary Magdalene

The Feast of St. Mary Magdalene

Sunday 22nd July 2007

Rosie Junemann
Reader, St Cuthbert’s, Benfieldside

Song of Solomon 3. 1-4
2 Corinthians 5. 14-17
John 20. 1-2, 11-18



As some of you know, I’ve been going to evening classes at Derwentside College for the past year, training to be a teaching assistant. My fellow students are a very cheerful group of women and it’s been good to make some new friends. One evening in the last few weeks we arrived in our classroom to find that, instead of sitting in small groups, as usual, we were all seated around a long table.

“It’s just like the Last Supper!” one woman exclaimed.

“Well, if it’s the Last Supper, I’ll be Mary Magdalene” said another.

Eyebrows were raised.

“Well, Mary Magdalene was at the Last Supper, wasn’t she?” the woman protested!

Of course, everyone who has read Dan Brown’s novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’ will know for sure that Mary Magdalene was at the Last Supper and that her presence was recorded in the famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci.

Or was she?

Stories about Mary Magdalene abound. The popular image of her (before Dan Brown wrote his book!) was that of a fallen woman – a prostitute even – who has been redeemed by Jesus. For centuries she was portrayed as a penitent sinner, often depicted in art as semi-naked or as an outcast in the wilderness. And yet there is no mention in the gospels that she was either a sinner or a prostitute. The problem was that at some point Mary Magdalene became confused with two other women in the Bible: Mary, the sister of Martha, at Bethany, and the unnamed ‘sinner’ from Luke’s Gospel, both of whom washed Jesus’ feet and dried them with their hair. In the 6th century Pope Gregory the Great made this assumption official by declaring in a sermon that these three characters were actually the same person. It wasn’t until 1969 that the Catholic Church declared that they’d got it wrong!

But the reputation still lingers.

Some Roman Catholic sources still maintain that the three Marys were one and the same person. They also relate a French tradition, that Mary Magdalene, along with Lazarus, Martha, and other companions, came to Marseilles, after the death of Jesus, and converted the whole of Provence. Mary spent the rest of her life there as a penitent. According to one story she lived in a cave and was given the Holy Eucharist daily by angels as her only food. Her relics are preserved in a shrine at a place called La Sainte-Baume.

There are still more stories to come!

In 1945, at a place called Nag Hammadi in southern Egypt, two men came across a sealed ceramic jar. Inside they discovered a hoard of ancient papyrus books. They were written in Coptic, the language of early Christian Egypt, and were discovered to be early Christian texts. The discovery included books known as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip and the Acts of Peter. None were included in the Bible, because the content didn’t conform to Christian doctrine. They’re referred to as ‘apocryphal’. And they provide a new source of information about Mary Magdalene.
She is a key figure in the Gospel of Philip. Here she is portrayed as Jesus’ closest companion and as a symbol of heavenly wisdom.

Another apocryphal book, the Gospel of Mary, was discovered in 1896. Further fragments came to light during the 20th century. Here, Mary Magdalene features as someone who takes charge after the death of Jesus, encouraging the other disciples to go out and preach and helping them to understand his teaching. The Gospel of Mary was also written in the early years of Christianity, when Christians lived and worshipped in small, scattered communities around the Eastern Mediterranean. These early churches often held conflicting beliefs and practices. The Gospel of Mary tells us that Mary Magdalene was remembered in at least some of these communities, especially those in Syria, Asia Minor and Egypt, and was respected as a spiritual guide and leader, a reconciling presence in the face of conflict within the community. As a result of studying the Gospel of Mary, a group of Episcopalian Christians in Houston, Texas have founded a Magdalene Community. They are concerned about divisive thinking – how we label people in harmful ways when we don’t understand them. We must find a shared peace, they say, and have more respect for other people.

And, finally, we come to Dan Brown’s book ‘The Da Vinci Code’, the latest in a series of novels which popularized the idea that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus. According to Dan Brown’s story, Mary was of royal descent through the Jewish House of Benjamin. She was already pregnant with his child when Jesus was crucified. After his death she travelled to France and gave birth to a daughter, Sarah. It’s an entertaining read, but you have to remember that it is, after all, a work of fiction!

So, legend and myth aside, what do we know about the life of Mary Magdalene?

The Bible provides no personal details of her age, status or family. Her name gives us the first clue about her identity. It suggests that she came from a place called Magdala, a small fishing village on the Sea of Galilee. She is first mentioned in the Gospels as a woman whom Jesus cured of seven demons. Since the term ‘demons’ probably refers to sickness or disability, and the number seven is generally used to denote completion or fulfilment, we can guess that Mary had suffered some kind of serious affliction until Jesus was able to restore her to health. Given a second chance, a new life, Mary became a follower of Jesus. Along with several other women she provided for Jesus and his disciples out of her own resources.

The Bible also tells us that Mary Magdalene was there at the two most important moments in the story of Jesus: the crucifixion and the resurrection. She was one of a number of women who were present at the crucifixion. We can only begin to imagination the pain of that experience. But under Roman law the relatives had the right to claim the bodies of people who were crucified and take them away for burial. Otherwise they would be disposed of on the common rubbish-tip. And, according to Jewish custom, it was the women’s duty to prepare a body for burial, with linen cloths and perfumed ointments.

And Mary was the first witness of Jesus’ resurrection. In this morning’s moving account from St John’s Gospel, Mary Magdalene is first at the tomb, while it was still dark, anxious and urgent in her need to tend the body of her Lord. Being alerted by Mary, John and Simon Peter come to see the empty tomb and then go home again. But Mary remains, weeping outside the tomb, in her grief and despair. When Jesus approaches her she doesn’t recognise him at first, but responds eagerly when he calls her by name. Now she is the first to be able to declare ‘I have seen the Lord!’ Once again she is restored to new life and fresh hope.

Although women are traditionally honoured and respected in Jewish households, at the time of Jesus men were more prominent socially and women were often treated as inferior. Jesus was different. In his interactions with women and in his teaching, it’s clear that he regarded men and women as equals. Women are there at the heart of the Jesus story. They are not often given a starring role, but they are relentlessly there, nonetheless. Think of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and her cousin Elizabeth; Anna, the aged prophetess; Mary and Martha, the sisters from Bethany; Joanna and Susanna, who with Mary Magdalene provided for Jesus and the disciples. Then there were the women who followed Jesus from Galilee to Golgotha – his mother, Mary, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, Mary the mother of James and Joses, Mary the mother of James and John – the sons of Zebedee, Salome - and Mary Magdalene. Some of these women also came to the tomb bringing burial spices – in some accounts Mary the mother of James, and Salome accompanied Mary Magdalene. And, remember, there were women at prayer with the disciples in the Upper Room on the day of Pentecost.

These women are not often at the forefront of the Gospel story. They provide a quiet counterpoint to the drama of the Passion. Theirs is a life of loyal support, loving service and visionary faith.

Was Mary Magdalene at the Last Supper? We shall never know.

But you might like to think of her there, perhaps preparing or serving the food, perhaps watchful and attentive - a consistently loyal, loving and faithful servant to her Lord.


Teach us to pray...

Trinity 8 - Year C

Eucharist – 29th July 2007

Martin Jackson
Vicar of St. Cuthbert's

Genesis 18.20-32;
Colossians 2.6-19;
Luke 11.1-13



Today’s Gospel reading addresses that most basic of questions: “How should I pray?” It’s a basic question not just for Christians,… not just, I suspect, for people who might call themselves “religious.” And Jesus gives two answers. The first is simply a prayer you can use… and it’s the Lord’s Prayer. The second answer is an encouragement to go on praying, just as you’d go on asking for something you really need. Let me say something more about each of these.

I began by saying that the question, “How should I pray?” is a basic question not just for Christians, but one that applies even more widely than to people who might call themselves “religious.” What I mean in this is that sense of what you do when there’s no one else to turn to. I remember when I was an undergraduate over 30 years ago, listening to a fellow student describe a sort of nightmare he’d had. He wouldn’t describe himself as being religious, and was very doubtful about the confident orthodoxies of students who belonged to the Christian Union. But he left a lasting impression on me as he described how he’d try to wake up from his dream, and how he’d found himself trying to say the Lord’s Prayer, but couldn’t remember the words. And part of the nightmare was whether he couldn’t actually remember the words or whether he was in such a state that he couldn’t remember the words. How do you begin to pray? And the dream was right - you can make a start with the Lord’s Prayer… And that’s where he’d been overcome with fear, because the nightmare was that he couldn’t even make a start with that prayer.

You might think that praying the Lord’s Prayer is basic. And I think it is. But I’m reaching the point where I don’t think we can rely on people to know it. In the past I’ve always said to couples producing an order of service for their wedding that they needn’t include the Lord’s Prayer because we’ll say it in its familiar more traditional form. But this year I’ve been admitting that I’m not so sure about that. When we get to the point of saying the Lord’s Prayer at weddings and funerals these days I suspect that people are not joining in quite as confidently as we used to expect. At school assemblies I’m pretty sure that I can’t count on all the children to know it, and I suspect that we’re in a culture now where it’s pretty difficult to expect that we have the right to teach it. So perhaps we need to be printing the words out more. Perhaps I need to think out a few assemblies where I talk about prayer being central to Christianity - and then I’ll have to say that when Christians start praying they start with the Lord’s Prayer.

Whether or not people in general today know the words of the Lord’s Prayer isn’t a matter for recrimination with them. As Christians we need to start by asking, “how do I pray?” Do we take the time and trouble to pray? Do we pray every day? Do we even say the Lord’s Prayer sometime during the day? There needs to be the desire for prayer. Jesus teaches the disciples to pray after one of them comes and asks to be taught. Do you want to pray in the first place? And perhaps I need to ask, why should you? And here we can learn something more. The disciples want to learn how to pray because they’d seen other people pray. They knew that John the Baptist had taught his disciples how to pray - so now they want to learn how they should pray as disciples of Jesus. Is there something for us to learn there? Whatever else people might say about the harmful effects of different religions and about the strength of Islam and what young people learn in mosques, there is no denying that the vast majority of Muslims are exemplary in saying their prayers - in a way that few Christians can match. The psalms which we share in the Jewish scriptures say “Seven times a day will I praise you, O Lord,” but how many Christians manage once? Against this we know that Muslims take seriously their call to prayer five times a day - they know their teaching and act upon it. So perhaps we should ask, “teach me as a Christian to pray, even as I see my fellow citizen who happens to be a Muslim prays!”

But there’s something more. It’s not just that the disciples see other people praying. They see Jesus pray. The disciple who asks, “Teach us to pray,” does so when he’s with Jesus - and Jesus has gone, we’re told, to “a certain place” with the definite intention of praying. It’s when Jesus has finished praying that the disciple makes his request. And that’s a reminder to us that to pray is to learn what it is to be Christ-like. Jesus prays, and we can pray and grow with him. By prayer we can grow to be like him. And the first word of the prayer Jesus gives his disciples tells us that prayer is a shared calling with Jesus: “Father…” When we address God, we address him as Jesus addressed him. God is our Father, and Jesus is our brother in prayer. Prayer is something to take seriously if we are to grow as Christians.

Perhaps it’s time we had a whole series of sermons on the Lord’s Prayer. But for now, just notice how it starts. “Our Father…” We can address God as a member of our own family - or r