This is The North East | CommuniGate | Catholic Tradition Feedback
This is The North East -  CommuniGate
*
Content * * *
Welcome to Catholic Tradition

Mass Propers in Latin and English

Latin-English text of the traditional Mass

What is the Traditional Latin Mass?

The Society of St Pius X

We want the true Mass - do you?

New and Old Mass Compared

Notable Quotes

The Controversy over the publication of the New Mass

Open Letter to Confused Catholics

Who was Archbishop Lefebvre?

Was the Traditional Latin Mass ever legally suppressed?

Traditional Catholic Prayers

The Rosary in English and Latin

The Holy Infant of Prague

A Guided Tour of the Traditional Latin Mass

Profession Of Catholic Faith For Converts

Words of encouragement from St. Athanasius

True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary

SSPX Mass times and venues in the U.K.

Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre

Stations of the Cross

Reclaim your heritage

The Catechism of the Council of Trent

The Baltimore Catechism

Catechism of St Pius X

A Tribute to Archbishop Lefebvre

Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Latin and English

The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

How to contact a priest of the Society

The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary

The definitive biography of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

Church Conservation News

The Catholic Worker Movement: A Critical Analysis

Why Christian women should not wear trousers

Is Distributism Catholic?

Vaticangate: Justice denied to Archbishop Lefebvre

The New Laity and the Anti-clerical Factor

Excommunications withdrawn by the Vatican

Garcia Moreno Catholic Statesman and Martyr

Bishop Fellay on the Beatification of Pope John Paul II

A Fake War against Materialism

Traditional Catholic Hymns in Latin with English Translation

St Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on St Matthew's Gospel

Analysis of the Open Letter to Bishop Fellay

Message Board

Guestbook

Event Calendar

*

Cardinal Newman's Meditation on the Assumption

MARY IS THE "SANCTA DEl GENITRIX": THE HOLY MOTHER OF GOD

"As soon as we apprehend by faith the great fundamental truth that Mary is the Mother of God, other wonderful truths follow in its train; and one of these is that she was exempt from the ordinary lot of mortals, which is not only to die, but to become earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Die she must, and die she did, as her Divine Son died, for He was man; but various reasons have approved themselves to holy writers, why, although her body was for a while separated from her soul and consigned to the tomb, yet it did not remain there, but was speedily united to her soul again, and raised by our Lord to a new and eternal life of heavenly glory

And the most obvious reason for so concluding is this - that other servants of God have been raised from the grave by the power of God, and it is not to be supposed that our Lord would have granted any such privilege to anyone else without also granting it to His own Mother.

We are told by St. Matthew, that after our Lord's death upon the Cross "the graves were opened, and many bodies of the saints that had slept" - that is, slept the sleep of death, "arose, and coming out of the tombs after His Resurrection, came into the Holy City and appeared to many St. Matthew says, "many bodies of the Saints" - that is, the holy Prophets, Priests, and Kings of former times - rose again in anticipation of the last day [Matt. 27:50-53.]

Can we suppose that Abraham, or David, or Isaias, or Ezechias, should have been thus favored, and not God's own Mother? Had she not a claim on the love of her Son to have what any others had? Was she not nearer to Him than the greatest of the Saints before her? And is it conceivable that the law of the grave should admit of relaxation in their case, and not in hers? Therefore we confidently say that our Lord, having preserved her from sin and the consequences of sin by His Passion, lost no time in pouring out the full merits of that Passion upon her body as well as her soul.

MARY IS THE "MATER INTEMERATA": THE SINLESS MOTHER

ANOTHER consideration which has led devout minds to believe in the Assumption of our Lady into heaven after her death, without waiting for the general resurrection at the last day, is furnished by the doctrine of her Immaculate Conception.

By her Immaculate Conception is meant, that not only did she never commit any sin whatever, even venial, in thought, word, or deed, but further than this, that the guilt of Adam, or what is called original sin, never was her guilt, as it is the guilt attaching to all other descendants of Adam.

By her Assumption is meant that not only her soul, but her body also, was taken up to heaven upon her death, so that there was no long period of her sleeping in the grave, as is the case with others, even great Saints, who wait for the last day for the resurrection of their bodies.

One reason for believing in our Lady's Assumption is that her Divine Son loved her too much to let her body remain in the grave. A second reason - that now before us - is this, that she was not only dear to the Lord as a mother is dear to a son, but also that she was so transcendently holy, so full, so overflowing with grace. Adam and Eve were created upright and sinless, and had a large measure of God's grace bestowed upon them; and, in consequence, their bodies would never have crumbled into dust, had they not sinned; upon which it was said to them, "Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return." If Eve, the beautiful daughter of God, never would have become dust and ashes unless she had sinned, shall we not say that Mary, having never sinned, retained the gift which Eve by sinning lost? What had Mary done to forfeit the privilege given to our first parents in the beginning? Was her comeliness to be turned into corruption, and her fine gold to become dim, without reason assigned? Impossible. Therefore we believe that, though she died for a short hour, as did our Lord Himself, yet, like Him, and by His Almighty power, she was raised again from the grave.

MARY IS THE "ROSA MYSTICA": THE MYSTICAL ROSE

Mary is the most beautiful flower that ever was seen in the spiritual world. It is by the power of God's grace that from this barren and desolate earth there have ever sprung up at all flowers of holiness and glory And Mary is the Queen of them. She is the Queen of spiritual flowers; and therefore she is called the Rose, for the rose is fitly called of all flowers the most beautiful.

But moreover, she is the Mystical, or hidden Rose; for mystical means hidden. How is she now "hidden" from us more than are other saints? What means this singular appellation, which we apply to her specially? The answer to this question introduces us to a third reason for believing in the reunion of her sacred body to her soul, and its assumption into heaven soon after her death, instead of its lingering in the grave until the General Resurrection at the last day.

It is this: if her body was not taken into heaven, where is it? how comes it that it is hidden from us? why do we not hear of her tomb as being here or there? why are not pilgrimages made to it? why are not relics producible of her, as of the saints in general? Is it not even a natural instinct which makes us reverent towards the places where our dead are buried? We bury our great men honorably St. Peter speaks of the sepulcher of David as known in his day [Acts 2:29], though he had died many hundred years before. When our Lord's body was taken down from the Cross, He was placed in an honorable tomb. Such too had been the honor already paid to St. John Baptist, his tomb being spoken of by St. Mark as generally known. Christians from the earliest times went from other countries to Jerusalem to see the holy places. And, when the time of persecution was over, they paid still more attention to the bodies of the Saints, as of St. Stephen, St. Mark, St. Barnabas, St. Peter, St. Paul, and other Apostles and Martyrs. These were transported to great cities, and portions of them sent to this place or that. Thus, from the first to this day it has been a great feature and characteristic of the Church to be most tender and reverent towards the bodies of the Saints. Now if there was anyone who more than all would be preciously taken care of, it would be our Lady Why then do we hear nothing of the Blessed Virgin's body and its separate relics? Why is she thus the hidden Rose? Is it conceivable that they who had been so reverent and careful of the bodies of the Saints and Martyrs should neglect her - her who was the Queen of Martyrs and the Queen of Saints, who was the very Mother of our Lord? It is impossible. Why then is she thus the hidden Rose? Plainly because that sacred body is in heaven, not on earth."

__________________________________________________

Pope Pius XII's Encyclical on the Assumption:

Deiparae Virginis Mariae

To the Patriarchs Primates, Archbishops, and other Ordinaries at Peace and in Communion with the Apostolic See.

1. The Christian people have never ceased to invoke and experience the Blessed Virgin Mary's assistance, and therefore they have, at all times, venerated her with ever growing devotion.

2. And so, because love when it is true and deeply felt tends of its own nature to manifest itself through ever renewed demonstrations, the faithful have vied with one another all through the centuries in expressing at all times their ardent piety toward the Queen of Heaven. In our opinion, this is the reason why, for a long time past, numerous petitions (those received from 1849 to 1940 have been gathered in two volumes which, accompanied with suitable comments, have been recently printed), from cardinals, patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, priests, religious of both sexes, associations, universities and innumerable private persons have reached the Holy See, all begging that the bodily Assumption into heaven of the Blessed Virgin should be defined and proclaimed as a dogma of faith. And certainly no one is unaware of the fact that this was fervently requested by almost two hundred fathers in the Vatican Council.

3. But We, who are charged with the care of defending and developing the Kingdom of Christ, have at the same time to exercise continual care and vigilance to keep away everything adverse to this Kingdom, and to support whatsoever may promote it. Therefore, from the beginning of Our Pontificate, we had to examine most carefully whether it would be lawful, convenient and useful to support with Our authority the above mentioned petitions. We have not neglected and do not at present neglect to offer insistent prays to God that He might clearly manifest the will of His ever-adorable goodness in this instance.

4. In order that We may receive the gift of heavenly light, do you, Venerable Brethren, in pious competition, unite your entreaties with Ours. But, while paternally exhorting you to do this, thus following the example of Our Predecessors, and particularly that of Pius IX when about to define the dogma of the Mother of God's Immaculate Conception, we earnestly beg you to inform us about the devotion of your clergy and people (taking into account their faith and piety) toward the Assumption of the most Blessed Virgin Mary. More especially We wish to know if you, Venerable Brethren, with your learning and prudence consider that the bodily Assumption of the Immaculate Blessed Virgin can be proposed and defined as a dogma of faith, and whether in addition to your own wishes this is desired by your clergy and people.

5. We shall be most grateful for your prompt response and we entreat an abundance of divine favors and the favorable assistance of the heavenly Virgin upon you, venerable brothers, and upon yours, while we most lovingly impart our apostolic blessing in the Lord as a token of our fatherly affection to you and to the flocks committed to your care.

Given at Rome at St. Peter's on the first day of May in the year 1946, the eighth of our pontificate. In view of worldwide request, Pope Pius XII sent this letter in forma del tutto reservata, under date of 1 May 1946, to all the bishops of the world asking what their clergy and people thought about the Assumption and whether they themselves judged it "wise and prudent" that the dogma should be defined.

This page has been visited times.

Email Email page
Feedback Feedback
Home Home


Welcome to Catholic Tradition |Mass Propers in Latin and English |Latin-English text of the traditional Mass |What is the Traditional Latin Mass? |The Society of St Pius X |We want the true Mass - do you? |New and Old Mass Compared |Notable Quotes |The Controversy over the publication of the New Mass |Open Letter to Confused Catholics |Who was Archbishop Lefebvre? |Was the Traditional Latin Mass ever legally suppressed? |Traditional Catholic Prayers |The Rosary in English and Latin |The Holy Infant of Prague |A Guided Tour of the Traditional Latin Mass |Profession Of Catholic Faith For Converts |Words of encouragement from St. Athanasius |True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary |SSPX Mass times and venues in the U.K. |Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre |Stations of the Cross |Reclaim your heritage |The Catechism of the Council of Trent |The Baltimore Catechism |Catechism of St Pius X |A Tribute to Archbishop Lefebvre |Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Latin and English |The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass |How to contact a priest of the Society |The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary |The definitive biography of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre |Church Conservation News |The Catholic Worker Movement: A Critical Analysis |Why Christian women should not wear trousers |Is Distributism Catholic? |Vaticangate: Justice denied to Archbishop Lefebvre |The New Laity and the Anti-clerical Factor |Excommunications withdrawn by the Vatican |Garcia Moreno Catholic Statesman and Martyr |Bishop Fellay on the Beatification of Pope John Paul II |A Fake War against Materialism |Traditional Catholic Hymns in Latin with English Translation |St Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on St Matthew's Gospel |Analysis of the Open Letter to Bishop Fellay |Message Board |Guestbook |Event Calendar